Abstract
This paper analyzes the distribution of powers before and after the implementation of participatory forest management (PFM) in Kenya. The paper is a case study of the Karima forest in the Central Highlands of Kenya. The study relies primarily on 34 semi-structured interviews with key actors involved in and affected by the PFM. The paper finds that the established Community Forest Association (CFA) has not been entrusted with significant powers; all powers and benefits remain with the local authority (county government). Moreover, the paper documents that the CFA offers a poor representation of the forest communities and weak downward accountability relations. Finally, it illustrates a planning process, which has weaknesses in participation and inclusiveness. Consequently, the paper suggests three areas for PFM policy reform in Kenya: (i) the role (powers) and function of CFAs; (ii) benefit sharing; and (iii) ways to make the PFM process more participatory and inclusive.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | International Forestry Review |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 357-368 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISSN | 1465-5489 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- accountability
- benefit sharing
- Democratic decentralization
- rights