Flood risk management in Italy: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC)

J. Mysiak; F. Testella; M. Bonaiuto; G. Carrus; S. De Dominicis; U. Ganucci Cancellieri; K. Firus; P. Grifoni

doi:10.5194/nhess-13-2883-2013

Flood risk management in Italy: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC)

J. Mysiak^*, F. Testella, M. Bonaiuto, G. Carrus, S. De Dominicis, U. Ganucci Cancellieri, K. Firus, P. Grifoni

^*Corresponding author for this work

Sport, Individual & Society

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Italy's recent history is punctuated with devastating flood disasters claiming high death toll and causing vast but underestimated economic, social and environmental damage. The responses to major flood and landslide disasters such as the Polesine (1951), Vajont (1963), Firenze (1966), Valtelina (1987), Piedmont (1994), Crotone (1996), Sarno (1998), Soverato (2000), and Piedmont (2000) events have contributed to shaping the country's flood risk governance. Insufficient resources and capacity, slow implementation of the (at that time) novel risk prevention and protection framework, embodied in the law 183/89 of 18 May 1989, increased the reliance on the response and recovery operations of the civil protection. As a result, the importance of the Civil Protection Mechanism and the relative body of norms and regulation developed rapidly in the 1990s. In the aftermath of the Sarno (1998) and Soverato (2000) disasters, the Department for Civil Protection (DCP) installed a network of advanced early warning and alerting centres, the cornerstones of Italy's preparedness for natural hazards and a best practice worth following. However, deep convective clouds, not uncommon in Italy, producing intense rainfall and rapidly developing localised floods still lead to considerable damage and loss of life that can only be reduced by stepping up the risk prevention efforts. The implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) provides an opportunity to revise the model of flood risk governance and confront the shortcomings encountered during more than 20 yr of organised flood risk management. This brief communication offers joint recommendations towards this end from three projects funded by the 2nd CRUE ERA-NET (http://www.crue-eranet.net/) Funding Initiative: FREEMAN, IMRA and URFlood.

Original language	English
Journal	Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Volume	13
Issue number	11
Pages (from-to)	2883-2890
Number of pages	8
ISSN	1561-8633
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2883-2013
Publication status	Published - 28 Nov 2013

Access to Document

10.5194/nhess-13-2883-2013

nhess-13-2883-2013.pdfFinal published version, 106 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{a35133eb7a6c4a099407fc2a9e451166,

title = "Flood risk management in Italy: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC)",

abstract = "Italy's recent history is punctuated with devastating flood disasters claiming high death toll and causing vast but underestimated economic, social and environmental damage. The responses to major flood and landslide disasters such as the Polesine (1951), Vajont (1963), Firenze (1966), Valtelina (1987), Piedmont (1994), Crotone (1996), Sarno (1998), Soverato (2000), and Piedmont (2000) events have contributed to shaping the country's flood risk governance. Insufficient resources and capacity, slow implementation of the (at that time) novel risk prevention and protection framework, embodied in the law 183/89 of 18 May 1989, increased the reliance on the response and recovery operations of the civil protection. As a result, the importance of the Civil Protection Mechanism and the relative body of norms and regulation developed rapidly in the 1990s. In the aftermath of the Sarno (1998) and Soverato (2000) disasters, the Department for Civil Protection (DCP) installed a network of advanced early warning and alerting centres, the cornerstones of Italy's preparedness for natural hazards and a best practice worth following. However, deep convective clouds, not uncommon in Italy, producing intense rainfall and rapidly developing localised floods still lead to considerable damage and loss of life that can only be reduced by stepping up the risk prevention efforts. The implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) provides an opportunity to revise the model of flood risk governance and confront the shortcomings encountered during more than 20 yr of organised flood risk management. This brief communication offers joint recommendations towards this end from three projects funded by the 2nd CRUE ERA-NET (http://www.crue-eranet.net/) Funding Initiative: FREEMAN, IMRA and URFlood.",

author = "J. Mysiak and F. Testella and M. Bonaiuto and G. Carrus and {De Dominicis}, S. and Cancellieri, {U. Ganucci} and K. Firus and P. Grifoni",

year = "2013",

month = nov,

day = "28",

doi = "10.5194/nhess-13-2883-2013",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "2883--2890",

journal = "Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences",

issn = "1561-8633",

publisher = "Copernicus GmbH",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flood risk management in Italy

T2 - Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC)

AU - Mysiak, J.

AU - Testella, F.

AU - Bonaiuto, M.

AU - Carrus, G.

AU - De Dominicis, S.

AU - Cancellieri, U. Ganucci

AU - Firus, K.

AU - Grifoni, P.

PY - 2013/11/28

Y1 - 2013/11/28

N2 - Italy's recent history is punctuated with devastating flood disasters claiming high death toll and causing vast but underestimated economic, social and environmental damage. The responses to major flood and landslide disasters such as the Polesine (1951), Vajont (1963), Firenze (1966), Valtelina (1987), Piedmont (1994), Crotone (1996), Sarno (1998), Soverato (2000), and Piedmont (2000) events have contributed to shaping the country's flood risk governance. Insufficient resources and capacity, slow implementation of the (at that time) novel risk prevention and protection framework, embodied in the law 183/89 of 18 May 1989, increased the reliance on the response and recovery operations of the civil protection. As a result, the importance of the Civil Protection Mechanism and the relative body of norms and regulation developed rapidly in the 1990s. In the aftermath of the Sarno (1998) and Soverato (2000) disasters, the Department for Civil Protection (DCP) installed a network of advanced early warning and alerting centres, the cornerstones of Italy's preparedness for natural hazards and a best practice worth following. However, deep convective clouds, not uncommon in Italy, producing intense rainfall and rapidly developing localised floods still lead to considerable damage and loss of life that can only be reduced by stepping up the risk prevention efforts. The implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) provides an opportunity to revise the model of flood risk governance and confront the shortcomings encountered during more than 20 yr of organised flood risk management. This brief communication offers joint recommendations towards this end from three projects funded by the 2nd CRUE ERA-NET (http://www.crue-eranet.net/) Funding Initiative: FREEMAN, IMRA and URFlood.

AB - Italy's recent history is punctuated with devastating flood disasters claiming high death toll and causing vast but underestimated economic, social and environmental damage. The responses to major flood and landslide disasters such as the Polesine (1951), Vajont (1963), Firenze (1966), Valtelina (1987), Piedmont (1994), Crotone (1996), Sarno (1998), Soverato (2000), and Piedmont (2000) events have contributed to shaping the country's flood risk governance. Insufficient resources and capacity, slow implementation of the (at that time) novel risk prevention and protection framework, embodied in the law 183/89 of 18 May 1989, increased the reliance on the response and recovery operations of the civil protection. As a result, the importance of the Civil Protection Mechanism and the relative body of norms and regulation developed rapidly in the 1990s. In the aftermath of the Sarno (1998) and Soverato (2000) disasters, the Department for Civil Protection (DCP) installed a network of advanced early warning and alerting centres, the cornerstones of Italy's preparedness for natural hazards and a best practice worth following. However, deep convective clouds, not uncommon in Italy, producing intense rainfall and rapidly developing localised floods still lead to considerable damage and loss of life that can only be reduced by stepping up the risk prevention efforts. The implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) provides an opportunity to revise the model of flood risk governance and confront the shortcomings encountered during more than 20 yr of organised flood risk management. This brief communication offers joint recommendations towards this end from three projects funded by the 2nd CRUE ERA-NET (http://www.crue-eranet.net/) Funding Initiative: FREEMAN, IMRA and URFlood.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888191147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/nhess-13-2883-2013

DO - 10.5194/nhess-13-2883-2013

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84888191147

SN - 1561-8633

VL - 13

SP - 2883

EP - 2890

JO - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

JF - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

IS - 11

ER -

Flood risk management in Italy: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC)

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this