Three approaches to coordinated bargaining: A case for power-based explanations

9 Citations (Scopus)
1956 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article discusses three theoretical approaches to the study of coordinated collective bargaining, each positing different causal mechanisms: rational choice, rationalist institutionalism and discursive institutionalism. Each approach involves a different view of the exercise of power and distributional consequences. The three approaches are applied to the critical cases of Sweden and Denmark. The conclusion drawn is that coordination is not purely cooperative, and that cooperation is itself conditioned by power relations. Thus power must be placed at the heart of coordination studies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Industrial Relations
Volume21
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)39-56
Number of pages18
ISSN0959-6801
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2015

Keywords

  • Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Coordinated collective bargaining
  • Denmark
  • discursive institutionalism
  • rational choice
  • rationalist institutionalism
  • Sweden

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three approaches to coordinated bargaining: A case for power-based explanations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this