The outcome of PIE *#Hi- and *#Hu- in Germanic

Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen

doi:10.1515/if-2015-0004

The outcome of PIE **#Hi-* and **#Hu-* in Germanic

Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen

Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics

1133 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It has been established with a great amount of certainty that PIE ∗#Hu- > Gr. #V- and that PIE ∗#Hi- > Gr. #-. It still remains to be demonstrated what happens in other Western Indo-European branches, including Germanic. In this article,1 I reject the statement by Ringe (1988: 433) that PIE ∗#Hu- becomes PG ∗#uand propose the possibility of differentiated outcomes dependent on the timbre of the PIE laryngeal, viz. that PIE ∗#h₁i- > PG ∗#i- and PIE ∗#h₁u- > PG ∗#u- as assumed by most scholars, but that PIE ∗#h₂i- and PIE ∗#h₂u- might yield PG ∗#ai- and PG ∗#au-, respectively. Furthermore, I tentatively propose that PG ∗#au- > PG ∗#uwhen followed by a labial consonant; a development partially paralleled in Greek and in English.

Translated title of the contribution	Udviklingen af ie. #Hi- og #Hu- i germansk
Original language	English
Journal	Indogermanische Forschungen
Volume	120
Pages (from-to)	31-76
ISSN	0019-7262
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1515/if-2015-0004
Publication status	Published - 16 Oct 2015

Keywords

Faculty of Humanities
Indo-European
Germanic
phonology
laryngeals
diphthongs
vowel prothesis

Access to Document

10.1515/if-2015-0004

Hansen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard - The outcome of PIE Hi- and Hu- in Germanic - 2015 - pp. 31-76Final published version, 326 KB

The outcome of PIE *#Hi- and *#Hu- in Germanic
Hansen, B. S. S. (Lecturer)
6 Feb 2014
Activity: Talk or presentation types › Lecture and oral contribution

Cite this

@article{491362dd7d1a4cdabec13b1774b307d0,

title = "The outcome of PIE *#Hi- and *#Hu- in Germanic",

abstract = "It has been established with a great amount of certainty that PIE ∗#Hu- > Gr. #V- and that PIE ∗#Hi- > Gr. #-. It still remains to be demonstrated what happens in other Western Indo-European branches, including Germanic. In this article,1 I reject the statement by Ringe (1988: 433) that PIE ∗#Hu- becomes PG ∗#uand propose the possibility of differentiated outcomes dependent on the timbre of the PIE laryngeal, viz. that PIE ∗#h1i- > PG ∗#i- and PIE ∗#h1u- > PG ∗#u- as assumed by most scholars, but that PIE ∗#h2i- and PIE ∗#h2u- might yield PG ∗#ai- and PG ∗#au-, respectively. Furthermore, I tentatively propose that PG ∗#au- > PG ∗#uwhen followed by a labial consonant; a development partially paralleled in Greek and in English.",

keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Indo-European, Germanic, phonology, laryngeals, diphthongs, vowel prothesis, Indoeurop{\ae}isk, germansk, fonologi, laryngaler, diftonger, protetiske vokaler",

author = "Hansen, {Bjarne Simmelkj{\ae}r Sandgaard}",

year = "2015",

month = oct,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1515/if-2015-0004",

language = "English",

volume = "120",

pages = "31--76",

journal = "Indogermanische Forschungen",

issn = "0019-7262",

publisher = "Mouton de Gruyter",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The outcome of PIE *#Hi- and *#Hu- in Germanic

AU - Hansen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard

PY - 2015/10/16

Y1 - 2015/10/16

N2 - It has been established with a great amount of certainty that PIE ∗#Hu- > Gr. #V- and that PIE ∗#Hi- > Gr. #-. It still remains to be demonstrated what happens in other Western Indo-European branches, including Germanic. In this article,1 I reject the statement by Ringe (1988: 433) that PIE ∗#Hu- becomes PG ∗#uand propose the possibility of differentiated outcomes dependent on the timbre of the PIE laryngeal, viz. that PIE ∗#h1i- > PG ∗#i- and PIE ∗#h1u- > PG ∗#u- as assumed by most scholars, but that PIE ∗#h2i- and PIE ∗#h2u- might yield PG ∗#ai- and PG ∗#au-, respectively. Furthermore, I tentatively propose that PG ∗#au- > PG ∗#uwhen followed by a labial consonant; a development partially paralleled in Greek and in English.

AB - It has been established with a great amount of certainty that PIE ∗#Hu- > Gr. #V- and that PIE ∗#Hi- > Gr. #-. It still remains to be demonstrated what happens in other Western Indo-European branches, including Germanic. In this article,1 I reject the statement by Ringe (1988: 433) that PIE ∗#Hu- becomes PG ∗#uand propose the possibility of differentiated outcomes dependent on the timbre of the PIE laryngeal, viz. that PIE ∗#h1i- > PG ∗#i- and PIE ∗#h1u- > PG ∗#u- as assumed by most scholars, but that PIE ∗#h2i- and PIE ∗#h2u- might yield PG ∗#ai- and PG ∗#au-, respectively. Furthermore, I tentatively propose that PG ∗#au- > PG ∗#uwhen followed by a labial consonant; a development partially paralleled in Greek and in English.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Indo-European

KW - Germanic

KW - phonology

KW - laryngeals

KW - diphthongs

KW - vowel prothesis

KW - Indoeuropæisk

KW - germansk

KW - fonologi

KW - laryngaler

KW - diftonger

KW - protetiske vokaler

U2 - 10.1515/if-2015-0004

DO - 10.1515/if-2015-0004

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0019-7262

VL - 120

SP - 31

EP - 76

JO - Indogermanische Forschungen

JF - Indogermanische Forschungen

ER -

The outcome of PIE **#Hi-* and **#Hu-* in Germanic

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint