The controversy over the retypification of Acacia Mill. with an Australian type: a pragmatic view

TY - JOUR

T1 - The controversy over the retypification of Acacia Mill. with an Australian type

T2 - a pragmatic view

AU - Thiele, Kevin R.

AU - Fnk, Vicki A.

AU - Iwatsuki, Kunio

AU - Morat, Philippe

AU - Peng, Ching-I

AU - Raven, Peter

AU - Sarukhán, José

AU - Seberg, Ole

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - The conservation of Acacia with an Australian type has been perhaps the most controversial issue to have been dealt with under the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature in many years. Before, during and since the vote on the matter at the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress in Vienna, strong opinions have been expressed in print, on the web and in the popular media. Opponents of the Vienna decision are currently focusing on details of the process by which the vote was conducted, rather than on the merits or otherwise of the original proposal. They have signalled an intention to challenge and to try to overturn the Vienna decision at the Melbourne Congress. We are a group of taxonomists, from a range of backgrounds and with a range of opinions on the original proposal, who believe that the Vienna process was fundamentally sound, and that continuance of this argument in its current form is damaging to the international nomenclatural consensus. We provide this paper as, we hope, an objective, non-partisan summary of the issue and conclude with the recommendation that the international taxonomic community should accept the retypification of Acacia and move on.

AB - The conservation of Acacia with an Australian type has been perhaps the most controversial issue to have been dealt with under the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature in many years. Before, during and since the vote on the matter at the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress in Vienna, strong opinions have been expressed in print, on the web and in the popular media. Opponents of the Vienna decision are currently focusing on details of the process by which the vote was conducted, rather than on the merits or otherwise of the original proposal. They have signalled an intention to challenge and to try to overturn the Vienna decision at the Melbourne Congress. We are a group of taxonomists, from a range of backgrounds and with a range of opinions on the original proposal, who believe that the Vienna process was fundamentally sound, and that continuance of this argument in its current form is damaging to the international nomenclatural consensus. We provide this paper as, we hope, an objective, non-partisan summary of the issue and conclude with the recommendation that the international taxonomic community should accept the retypification of Acacia and move on.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Botany

KW - Nomenclature

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0040-0262

VL - 60

SP - 194

EP - 198

JO - Taxon

JF - Taxon

IS - 1

ER -