Terrorist Threats and Judicial Deference

Jens Elo Rytter

doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013

Terrorist Threats and Judicial Deference

CECS - Centre for European and Comparative Legal Studies

Abstract

The article analyses the extent to which judicial restraint in cases concerning national security is justified. It is argued that the extent of restraint must depend on the normative issue/aspect which is subject to judicial review.

Translated title of the contribution	Terrortrusler og domstolstilbageholdenhed
Original language	English
Title of host publication	The Long Decade : How 9/11 Changed the Law
Editors	David Jenkins, Amanda Jacobsen, Anders Henriksen
Number of pages	21
Place of Publication	New York
Publisher	Oxford University Press
Publication date	2014
Pages	229-249
Chapter	13
ISBN (Print)	9780199368327
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013
Publication status	Published - 2014

Keywords

Faculty of Law

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013

Cite this

@inbook{0a6860181d24448b8f21f12df2fc9575,

title = "Terrorist Threats and Judicial Deference",

abstract = "The article analyses the extent to which judicial restraint in cases concerning national security is justified. It is argued that the extent of restraint must depend on the normative issue/aspect which is subject to judicial review.",

keywords = "Faculty of Law, judicial review; terrorism",

author = "Rytter, {Jens Elo}",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780199368327",

pages = "229--249",

editor = "David Jenkins and Jacobsen, {Amanda } and Anders Henriksen",

booktitle = "The Long Decade",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Terrorist Threats and Judicial Deference

AU - Rytter, Jens Elo

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The article analyses the extent to which judicial restraint in cases concerning national security is justified. It is argued that the extent of restraint must depend on the normative issue/aspect which is subject to judicial review.

AB - The article analyses the extent to which judicial restraint in cases concerning national security is justified. It is argued that the extent of restraint must depend on the normative issue/aspect which is subject to judicial review.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - judicial review; terrorism

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9780199368327

SP - 229

EP - 249

BT - The Long Decade

A2 - Jenkins, David

A2 - Jacobsen, Amanda

A2 - Henriksen, Anders

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - New York

ER -