Terrorist Threats and Judicial Deference

Jens Elo Rytter

doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013

Terrorist Threats and Judicial Deference

Bidragets oversatte titel: Terrortrusler og domstolstilbageholdenhed

Jens Elo Rytter

CECS - Centre for European and Comparative Legal Studies

Abstract

The article analyses the extent to which judicial restraint in cases concerning national security is justified. It is argued that the extent of restraint must depend on the normative issue/aspect which is subject to judicial review.

Bidragets oversatte titel	Terrortrusler og domstolstilbageholdenhed
Originalsprog	Engelsk
Titel	The Long Decade : How 9/11 Changed the Law
Redaktører	David Jenkins, Amanda Jacobsen, Anders Henriksen
Antal sider	21
Udgivelsessted	New York
Forlag	Oxford University Press
Publikationsdato	2014
Sider	229-249
Kapitel	13
ISBN (Trykt)	9780199368327
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013
Status	Udgivet - 2014

Emneord

Det Juridiske Fakultet
judicial review; terrorism

FN’s Verdensmål

Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013

Citationsformater

@inbook{0a6860181d24448b8f21f12df2fc9575,

title = "Terrorist Threats and Judicial Deference",

abstract = "The article analyses the extent to which judicial restraint in cases concerning national security is justified. It is argued that the extent of restraint must depend on the normative issue/aspect which is subject to judicial review.",

keywords = "Faculty of Law, judicial review; terrorism",

author = "Rytter, {Jens Elo}",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780199368327",

pages = "229--249",

editor = "David Jenkins and Jacobsen, {Amanda } and Anders Henriksen",

booktitle = "The Long Decade",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Terrorist Threats and Judicial Deference

AU - Rytter, Jens Elo

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The article analyses the extent to which judicial restraint in cases concerning national security is justified. It is argued that the extent of restraint must depend on the normative issue/aspect which is subject to judicial review.

AB - The article analyses the extent to which judicial restraint in cases concerning national security is justified. It is argued that the extent of restraint must depend on the normative issue/aspect which is subject to judicial review.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - judicial review; terrorism

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368327.003.0013

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9780199368327

SP - 229

EP - 249

BT - The Long Decade

A2 - Jenkins, David

A2 - Jacobsen, Amanda

A2 - Henriksen, Anders

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - New York

ER -