TY - JOUR
T1 - Spotted phenotypes in horses lost attractiveness in the Middle Ages
AU - Wutke, Saskia
AU - Benecke, Norbert
AU - Sandoval-Castellanos, Edson
AU - Döhle, Hans-Jürgen
AU - Friederich, Susanne
AU - Gonzalez, Javier
AU - Hallsson, Jón Hallsteinn
AU - Hofreiter, Michael
AU - Lõugas, Lembi
AU - Magnell, Ola
AU - Morales-Muniz, Arturo
AU - Orlando, Ludovic Antoine Alexandre
AU - Pálsdóttir, Albína Hulda
AU - Reissmann, Monika
AU - Ruttkay, Matej
AU - Trinks, Alexandra
AU - Ludwig, Arne
PY - 2016/12/7
Y1 - 2016/12/7
N2 - Horses have been valued for their diversity of coat colour since prehistoric times; this is especially the case since their domestication in the Caspian steppe in ~3,500 BC. Although we can assume that human preferences were not constant, we have only anecdotal information about how domestic horses were influenced by humans. Our results from genotype analyses show a significant increase in spotted coats in early domestic horses (Copper Age to Iron Age). In contrast, medieval horses carried significantly fewer alleles for these phenotypes, whereas solid phenotypes (i.e., chestnut) became dominant. This shift may have been supported because of (i) pleiotropic disadvantages, (ii) a reduced need to separate domestic horses from their wild counterparts, (iii) a lower religious prestige, or (iv) novel developments in weaponry. These scenarios may have acted alone or in combination. However, the dominance of chestnut is a remarkable feature of the medieval horse population.
AB - Horses have been valued for their diversity of coat colour since prehistoric times; this is especially the case since their domestication in the Caspian steppe in ~3,500 BC. Although we can assume that human preferences were not constant, we have only anecdotal information about how domestic horses were influenced by humans. Our results from genotype analyses show a significant increase in spotted coats in early domestic horses (Copper Age to Iron Age). In contrast, medieval horses carried significantly fewer alleles for these phenotypes, whereas solid phenotypes (i.e., chestnut) became dominant. This shift may have been supported because of (i) pleiotropic disadvantages, (ii) a reduced need to separate domestic horses from their wild counterparts, (iii) a lower religious prestige, or (iv) novel developments in weaponry. These scenarios may have acted alone or in combination. However, the dominance of chestnut is a remarkable feature of the medieval horse population.
U2 - 10.1038/srep38548
DO - 10.1038/srep38548
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 27924839
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 6
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
M1 - 38548
ER -