Quality Development in Healthcare: Participation vs. Accreditation

Jesper Simonsen, Morten Hertzum, John Damm Scheuer

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For more than a decade, quality development in the Danish health care sector has been managed with an accreditation system known as the Danish quality model (DQM), shaping the strategy for how to align work organization with technology use. In this article, we introduce a participatory design approach, known as effects-driven information technology development (EDIT), and discuss how this approach may contribute to a new quality-assurance program for the Danish health care sector. Our purpose is to demonstrate how accreditation, which focuses on processes and standards, needs to be supplemented and balanced with participatory approaches that allow for local experimentation and implementation of high-quality outcomes. We describe accreditation and participatory design as two approaches to reconfiguring and aligning work organization and technology; further, we emphasize the differences in each approach's strategy and application.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNordic Journal of Working Life Studies
Volume8
Issue numberS3
Pages (from-to)49-69
ISSN2245-0157
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Faculty of Humanities
  • Participatory design
  • work organization and technology
  • Accreditation
  • Danish quality model
  • Effects-driven IT development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality Development in Healthcare: Participation vs. Accreditation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this