Niqabis in Denmark: when politicians ask for a qualitative and quantitative profile of a very small and elusive subculture

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter presents the results of a study commissioned by the Danish government in connection with the political discussions on a ban of face veils in Denmark in 2009. Both the qualitative and the quantitative results challenged the political and public discourse at that time, and in the end the work fulfilled its purpose of giving a well-founded basis for political decision making. As such, the results are of general empirical interest, and they - by and large - demonstrated that the prevalence and motives of wearing face veils in Denmark are in line with what is known from other European studies. What also makes the study of general interest is the way in which we emphasized and addressed the methodological challenges of researching the small subculture of Muslim women wearing face veils in Denmark. These challenges were further augmented by the fact that the time allotted for the study was indeed limited, and that it was carried out in a politically tense atmosphere. The methodological issues, which make up a recurrent part of the discussion in the chapter, are relevant for a range of similar studies in the sociology of religion and also pertinent for the reliability of the conclusions, which in this case had to stand up against public prejudices and political spin.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Experiences of Face Veil Wearers in Europe and the Law
EditorsEva Brems
Number of pages35
Place of PublicationCambridge, United Kingdom
PublisherCambridge University Press
Publication date1 Jan 2014
Pages42-76
Chapter3
ISBN (Print)978-1-107-05830-9
ISBN (Electronic)9781316056851
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
SeriesCambridge Studies in Law and Society

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Niqabis in Denmark: when politicians ask for a qualitative and quantitative profile of a very small and elusive subculture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this