4 Citations (Scopus)
162 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Science centres and science museums face challenges such as increased accountability, increased demands for accessibility, and growing competition from leisure experiences. On their own, the traditional museum practices of preservation, communication, and research are insufficient to address these challenges. Accordingly, we use the framework of eight museum meta-functions, presented by Dubuc [2011. “Museum and University Mutations: The Relationship Between Museum Practices and Museum Studies in the Era of Interdisciplinarity, Professionalisation, Globalisation and New Technologies.” Museum Management and Curatorship 26 (5): 497–508] and further developed here, to understand how these institutions respond to calls for change. We analyse the presentations of staff members from 21 science centres and science museums, given at the 2013 Ecsite conference, to map out how these institutions address modern-day challenges. This analysis generates a new framework of nine meta-functions for science centres and science museums that can guide and help qualify discussions about their present and future activities. We discuss the new meta-functions as evidence of a turn away from the self-referential museum functions of the past, towards a more complete externalisation of purpose.

Translated title of the contributionNi metafunktioner for naturvidenskabelige museer og science centre
Original languageEnglish
JournalMuseum Management and Curatorship
Volume32
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)123-143
Number of pages21
ISSN0964-7775
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nine meta-functions for science museums and science centres'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this