Monitoring systems to improve forest conditions

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a lack of generalizable empirical analyses of whether particular types of monitoring promote effective forest governance, and under what circumstances. We reviewed a specific sample of the peer-reviewed literature on how monitoring, including state-level, participatory, and third-party monitoring, might affect forest conditions. Examining 25 cases, we found three trends which limit our understanding of the effect of monitoring. First, there was a bias toward studies in Brazil and India, indicating that the literature might not be globally representative. Second, no studies compared different types of monitoring. Third, the majority of studies relied on qualitative approaches, making comparison across cases difficult. These insights suggest focusing research agendas on comparative assessment across sites and monitoring systems.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume32
Pages (from-to)29-37
Number of pages9
ISSN1877-3435
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring systems to improve forest conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this