Interweaving categories: Styles, paradigms, and models

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analytical categories of scientific cultures have typically been used both exclusively and universally. For instance, when styles of scientific research are employed in attempts to understand and narrate science, styles alone are usually employed. This article is a thought experiment in interweaving categories. What would happen if rather than employ a single category, we instead investigated several categories simultaneously? What would we learn about the practices and theories, the agents and materials, and the political-technological impact of science if we analyzed and applied styles (à la Hacking and Crombie), paradigms (à la Kuhn), and models (à la van Fraassen and Cartwright) simultaneously? I address these questions in general and for a specific case study: a brief history of systematics.

Original languageEnglish
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science - Part A
Volume43
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)628-639
ISSN0039-3681
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interweaving categories: Styles, paradigms, and models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this