Interweaving categories: Styles, paradigms, and models

12 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Analytical categories of scientific cultures have typically been used both exclusively and universally. For instance, when styles of scientific research are employed in attempts to understand and narrate science, styles alone are usually employed. This article is a thought experiment in interweaving categories. What would happen if rather than employ a single category, we instead investigated several categories simultaneously? What would we learn about the practices and theories, the agents and materials, and the political-technological impact of science if we analyzed and applied styles (à la Hacking and Crombie), paradigms (à la Kuhn), and models (à la van Fraassen and Cartwright) simultaneously? I address these questions in general and for a specific case study: a brief history of systematics.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftStudies in History and Philosophy of Science - Part A
Vol/bind43
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)628-639
ISSN0039-3681
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 dec. 2012

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Interweaving categories: Styles, paradigms, and models'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater