Abstract
The article discusses whether the very peculiar Danish system of resolution of construction disputes, which is an hybrid between arbitration and State-Court proceedings, is geared for disputes involving non-Danish parties, comes to the conclusion that it is not, and proposes amendments to the system.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | International Construction Law Review |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 39-65 |
Number of pages | 27 |
ISSN | 0265-1416 |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2016 |
Keywords
- Faculty of Law
- Construction law, construction dispute, arbitration, pragmatism, Denmark, comparative law