International Construction Disputes in Denmark

Sylvie Cécile Cavaleri

International Construction Disputes in Denmark

CEPRI - Centre for Private Governance

Abstract

The article discusses whether the very peculiar Danish system of resolution of construction disputes, which is an hybrid between arbitration and State-Court proceedings, is geared for disputes involving non-Danish parties, comes to the conclusion that it is not, and proposes amendments to the system.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	International Construction Law Review
Vol/bind	33
Udgave nummer	1
Sider (fra-til)	39-65
Antal sider	27
ISSN	0265-1416
Status	Udgivet - jan. 2016

Emneord

Det Juridiske Fakultet

Citationsformater

@article{9cc0cf148482467ab12178f3a8820603,

title = "International Construction Disputes in Denmark",

abstract = "The article discusses whether the very peculiar Danish system of resolution of construction disputes, which is an hybrid between arbitration and State-Court proceedings, is geared for disputes involving non-Danish parties, comes to the conclusion that it is not, and proposes amendments to the system.",

keywords = "Faculty of Law, Construction law, construction dispute, arbitration, pragmatism, Denmark, comparative law",

author = "Cavaleri, {Sylvie C{\'e}cile}",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "39--65",

journal = "International Construction Law Review",

issn = "0265-1416",

publisher = "Informa U K Limited",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International Construction Disputes in Denmark

AU - Cavaleri, Sylvie Cécile

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - The article discusses whether the very peculiar Danish system of resolution of construction disputes, which is an hybrid between arbitration and State-Court proceedings, is geared for disputes involving non-Danish parties, comes to the conclusion that it is not, and proposes amendments to the system.

AB - The article discusses whether the very peculiar Danish system of resolution of construction disputes, which is an hybrid between arbitration and State-Court proceedings, is geared for disputes involving non-Danish parties, comes to the conclusion that it is not, and proposes amendments to the system.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - Construction law, construction dispute, arbitration, pragmatism, Denmark, comparative law

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0265-1416

VL - 33

SP - 39

EP - 65

JO - International Construction Law Review

JF - International Construction Law Review

IS - 1

ER -

International Construction Disputes in Denmark

Abstract

Emneord

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater