Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging

Henrik H. El Ali, Rasmus Poul Bodholdt, Jesper Tranekjær Jørgensen, Rebecca Sue Main Myschetzky, Andreas Kjær

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a correction for annihilation photon attenuation in small objects such as mice is necessary. The attenuation recovery for specific organs and subcutaneous tumors was investigated. A comparison between different attenuation correction methods was performed. Methods: Ten NMRI nude mice with subcutaneous implantation of human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were scanned consecutively in small animal PET and CT scanners (MicroPETTM Focus 120 and ImTek’s MicroCATTM II). CT-based AC, PET-based AC and uniform AC methods were compared. Results: The activity concentration in the same organ with and without AC revealed an overall attenuation recovery of 9–21% for MAP reconstructed images, i.e., SUV without AC could underestimate the true activity at this level. For subcutaneous tumors, the attenuation was 13 ± 4% (9–17%), for kidneys 20 ± 1% (19–21%), and for bladder 18 ± 3% (15–21%). The FBP reconstructed images showed almost the same attenuation levels as the MAP reconstructed images for all organs. Conclusions: The annihilation photons are suffering attenuation even in small subjects. Both PET-based and CT-based are adequate as AC methods. The amplitude of the AC recovery could be overestimated using the uniform map. Therefore, application of a global attenuation factor on PET data might not be accurate for attenuation correction.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDiagnostics
Volume2
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)42-51
Number of pages10
ISSN2075-4418
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Oct 2012

Keywords

  • Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences
  • attenuation correction
  • small animal
  • PET imaging
  • MicroPET
  • molecular imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this