Human Interest or Hard Numbers? Experiments on Citizens' Selection, Exposure, and Recall of Performance Information

    19 Citations (Scopus)
    79 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The abundance of quantitative performance information has motivated multiple studies about how citizens make sense of “hard” performance data. However, research in psychology emphasizes that episodic information (e.g., case stories) often leaves a greater mark on citizens. This contradiction is tested using multiple experiments embedded in a large, nationally representative sample of Danish citizens. The results stress three differences between statistical and episodic data. Citizens have strong preferences for statistical data when asked to evaluate an organization. However, episodic information has in some instances a stronger impact on citizens’ evaluations of an organization and often is more emotionally engaging than statistics. Finally, when asked to immediately recall recent performance information about public services, citizens report more elaborate information about personalized stories and experiences than about statistics. Overall, the results raise questions about the ability of hard performance data to dominate and crowd out episodic performance information.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalPublic Administration Review
    Volume77
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)408-420
    Number of pages12
    ISSN0033-3352
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Human Interest or Hard Numbers? Experiments on Citizens' Selection, Exposure, and Recall of Performance Information'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this