Human Interest or Hard Numbers? Experiments on Citizens' Selection, Exposure, and Recall of Performance Information

    19 Citationer (Scopus)
    79 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The abundance of quantitative performance information has motivated multiple studies about how citizens make sense of “hard” performance data. However, research in psychology emphasizes that episodic information (e.g., case stories) often leaves a greater mark on citizens. This contradiction is tested using multiple experiments embedded in a large, nationally representative sample of Danish citizens. The results stress three differences between statistical and episodic data. Citizens have strong preferences for statistical data when asked to evaluate an organization. However, episodic information has in some instances a stronger impact on citizens’ evaluations of an organization and often is more emotionally engaging than statistics. Finally, when asked to immediately recall recent performance information about public services, citizens report more elaborate information about personalized stories and experiences than about statistics. Overall, the results raise questions about the ability of hard performance data to dominate and crowd out episodic performance information.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftPublic Administration Review
    Vol/bind77
    Udgave nummer3
    Sider (fra-til)408-420
    Antal sider12
    ISSN0033-3352
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 1 maj 2017

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Human Interest or Hard Numbers? Experiments on Citizens' Selection, Exposure, and Recall of Performance Information'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater