EU Constitutionalisation Revisited: Redressing a central assumption in European Studies

Morten Rasmussen; Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen

doi:10.1111/eulj.12317

EU Constitutionalisation Revisited: Redressing a central assumption in European Studies

Morten Rasmussen, Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen

29 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The constitutionalisation of the European Union has since the early 1990s become a truism in European studies. This article revisits the constitutionalisation theory drawing on the insights from emerging historical research and new strands of political science research. We find that the conventional constitutional narrative is less convincing when confronted with the new evidence from historical and political science research. New historical research show that Member State governments, administrations and courts have generally been rather reluctant to embrace the constitutional project of the ECJ. Furthermore, at the level of European politics, the ECJ and its case law have far from judicialized European decision‐making to the extent often claimed. Concluding, we reject the notion that the ECJ has successfully constitutionalised the EU, emphasising instead the inherent tensions in the process, which continue to complicate the efficiency of European law.

Original language	English
Journal	European Law Journal
Volume	25
Issue number	3
Pages (from-to)	251-272
ISSN	1351-5993
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12317
Publication status	Published - May 2019

Access to Document

10.1111/eulj.12317

Rasmussen_Martinsen 2019_ELJSubmitted manuscript, 767 KB

Cite this

@article{7d8f4fffdf1548bdbe79f0023f40d4dc,

title = "EU Constitutionalisation Revisited: Redressing a central assumption in European Studies",

abstract = "The constitutionalisation of the European Union has since the early 1990s become a truism in European studies. This article revisits the constitutionalisation theory drawing on the insights from emerging historical research and new strands of political science research. We find that the conventional constitutional narrative is less convincing when confronted with the new evidence from historical and political science research. New historical research show that Member State governments, administrations and courts have generally been rather reluctant to embrace the constitutional project of the ECJ. Furthermore, at the level of European politics, the ECJ and its case law have far from judicialized European decision‐making to the extent often claimed. Concluding, we reject the notion that the ECJ has successfully constitutionalised the EU, emphasising instead the inherent tensions in the process, which continue to complicate the efficiency of European law.",

author = "Morten Rasmussen and Martinsen, {Dorte Sindbjerg}",

year = "2019",

month = may,

doi = "10.1111/eulj.12317",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "251--272",

journal = "European Law Journal",

issn = "1351-5993",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EU Constitutionalisation Revisited

T2 - Redressing a central assumption in European Studies

AU - Rasmussen, Morten

AU - Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - The constitutionalisation of the European Union has since the early 1990s become a truism in European studies. This article revisits the constitutionalisation theory drawing on the insights from emerging historical research and new strands of political science research. We find that the conventional constitutional narrative is less convincing when confronted with the new evidence from historical and political science research. New historical research show that Member State governments, administrations and courts have generally been rather reluctant to embrace the constitutional project of the ECJ. Furthermore, at the level of European politics, the ECJ and its case law have far from judicialized European decision‐making to the extent often claimed. Concluding, we reject the notion that the ECJ has successfully constitutionalised the EU, emphasising instead the inherent tensions in the process, which continue to complicate the efficiency of European law.

AB - The constitutionalisation of the European Union has since the early 1990s become a truism in European studies. This article revisits the constitutionalisation theory drawing on the insights from emerging historical research and new strands of political science research. We find that the conventional constitutional narrative is less convincing when confronted with the new evidence from historical and political science research. New historical research show that Member State governments, administrations and courts have generally been rather reluctant to embrace the constitutional project of the ECJ. Furthermore, at the level of European politics, the ECJ and its case law have far from judicialized European decision‐making to the extent often claimed. Concluding, we reject the notion that the ECJ has successfully constitutionalised the EU, emphasising instead the inherent tensions in the process, which continue to complicate the efficiency of European law.

U2 - 10.1111/eulj.12317

DO - 10.1111/eulj.12317

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1351-5993

VL - 25

SP - 251

EP - 272

JO - European Law Journal

JF - European Law Journal

IS - 3

ER -

EU Constitutionalisation Revisited: Redressing a central assumption in European Studies

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this