Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation?: A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study

Karina Nielsen; Raymond Randall; Karl B. Christensen

doi:10.1177/1558689815589050

Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation? A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study

Karina Nielsen, Raymond Randall, Karl B. Christensen

Section of Biostatistics

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A mixed methods approach was applied to examine the effects of a naturally occurring teamwork intervention supported with training. The first objective was to integrate qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation to examine how and why the training influence intervention outcomes. The intervention (N = 328) was supplemented with four training conditions (no training, team member training, team leader training, and a combination of training types). The second objective was to examine whether different training conditions support team member training in isolation, but not in combination, led to positive outcomes. The integrated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data indicated that a number of contextual factors interacted with training experiences and outcomes to influence the success of team intervention.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Mixed Methods Research
Volume	11
Issue number	2
Pages (from-to)	223-247
Number of pages	25
ISSN	1558-6898
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815589050
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2017

Access to Document

10.1177/1558689815589050

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1558689815589050

Cite this

@article{b23c6409fe1d4ad193a30ac0e7807bf7,

title = "Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation?: A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study",

abstract = "A mixed methods approach was applied to examine the effects of a naturally occurring teamwork intervention supported with training. The first objective was to integrate qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation to examine how and why the training influence intervention outcomes. The intervention (N = 328) was supplemented with four training conditions (no training, team member training, team leader training, and a combination of training types). The second objective was to examine whether different training conditions support team member training in isolation, but not in combination, led to positive outcomes. The integrated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data indicated that a number of contextual factors interacted with training experiences and outcomes to influence the success of team intervention.",

author = "Karina Nielsen and Raymond Randall and Christensen, {Karl B.}",

year = "2017",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1558689815589050",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "223--247",

journal = "Journal of Mixed Methods Research",

issn = "1558-6898",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation?

T2 - A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study

AU - Nielsen, Karina

AU - Randall, Raymond

AU - Christensen, Karl B.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - A mixed methods approach was applied to examine the effects of a naturally occurring teamwork intervention supported with training. The first objective was to integrate qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation to examine how and why the training influence intervention outcomes. The intervention (N = 328) was supplemented with four training conditions (no training, team member training, team leader training, and a combination of training types). The second objective was to examine whether different training conditions support team member training in isolation, but not in combination, led to positive outcomes. The integrated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data indicated that a number of contextual factors interacted with training experiences and outcomes to influence the success of team intervention.

AB - A mixed methods approach was applied to examine the effects of a naturally occurring teamwork intervention supported with training. The first objective was to integrate qualitative process evaluation and quantitative effect evaluation to examine how and why the training influence intervention outcomes. The intervention (N = 328) was supplemented with four training conditions (no training, team member training, team leader training, and a combination of training types). The second objective was to examine whether different training conditions support team member training in isolation, but not in combination, led to positive outcomes. The integrated analysis of qualitative and quantitative data indicated that a number of contextual factors interacted with training experiences and outcomes to influence the success of team intervention.

U2 - 10.1177/1558689815589050

DO - 10.1177/1558689815589050

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1558-6898

VL - 11

SP - 223

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Mixed Methods Research

JF - Journal of Mixed Methods Research

IS - 2

ER -

Do Different Training Conditions Facilitate Team Implementation? A Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this