Differences in carbon and nitrogen stable isotope signatures amongst wild and released pheasant populations

Per Moestrup Jensen, Lars Stoumann Jensen, Christian Bressen Pipper, Philip Madsen

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Game birds such as pheasants Phasianus colchicus (Horsfield) are bred and released to supplement wild living populations prior to the hunting season. The total bag records of these birds are, therefore, not suitable for monitoring the development of wild populations because they are heavily influenced by game management. Wild and released pheasants can be expected to be genetically similar or identical to wild birds because wild birds are captured and used for breeding. It is, therefore, not possible to use genetic methods for identifying released individuals. Heavy stable isotopes are incorporated in animal tissues in a predictable manner and depend on the concentration of heavy isotopes in the diet. The heavy isotopes 13C and 15N accumulate in the food chain because the more common lighter isotopes are excreted at a higher rate than the heavy isotopes. Bred and released pheasant feed on a uniform plant-based diet, and it can, therefore, be expected that these animals have lower and less variable levels of heavy isotopes than individuals from a wild populations which feed on a diverse diet of plants and invertebrates. We investigated the isotope signatures in feathers from wild and released pheasant populations and compared the levels and variation in isotope signature amongst the populations. Bred and released pheasants are clearly identified in comparison to released pheasants as wild types have higher δ15N.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEuropean Journal of Wildlife Research
    Volume58
    Issue number4
    Pages (from-to)755-760
    Number of pages6
    ISSN1612-4642
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in carbon and nitrogen stable isotope signatures amongst wild and released pheasant populations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this