Abstract

This chapter focuses on the extent to which states have accepted two global courts’ claims to authority. It provides an analysis of the legitimation of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body (AB), in the period 1996-2016. From meeting records in the years 1996-2016 a total of 2070 and 3410 individual paragraphs of 854 and 377 government statements on the AB and international court of justice respectively were manually extracted. While a number of UN and WTO members engage in debates, many do not formulate views on the courts. For the WTO AB the most pressing concern relates to the US’ dissatisfaction with the court and the country’s successful, unilateral dismemberment of the Appellate Body. The ICJ’s future does not seem as dire as that of the Appellate Body’s, but it too may encounter renewed challenges in the years ahead that may spill over to UN members’ usage of the Court.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Future of International Courts : Regional, Institutional and Procedural Challenges
EditorsAvidan Kent, Nikos Skoutaris, Jamie Trinidad
PublisherRoutledge
Publication date1 Jan 2019
Pages124-141
Chapter8
ISBN (Print)9781138615182
ISBN (Electronic)9780429463280
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Delegitimation of Global Courts: Lessons from the past'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this