Correcting for non-response bias in contingent valuation surveys concerning environmental non-market goods: an empirical investigation using an online panel

Ole Bonnichsen*, Søren Bøye Olsen

*Corresponding author for this work
8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data collection for economic valuation by using Internet surveys and pre-recruited Internet panels can be associated with severe disadvantages. Problems concerning sample coverage and sample representativeness can be expected. Representation errors may occur since people can choose whether to be part of an Internet panel and subsequently whether they wish to participate in the survey, thereby introducing two elements of potential self-selection. These elements may be correlated with preferences, thus making the respondents a non-random and non-representative sample, ultimately biasing results. This paper analyses a sample used for an Internet contingent valuation method survey eliciting preferences for improvements in water quality of a river. We find that some variables that affect the survey participation decision also affect willingness-to-pay, consequently biasing our welfare estimates. We show how adjusting willingness-to-pay for this bias can be accomplished by using a grouped data model incorporating a correlation parameter to account for selection.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
Volume59
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)245-262
Number of pages18
ISSN0964-0568
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • contingent valuation
  • Internet panel
  • sampling bias
  • selection bias
  • stated preferences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correcting for non-response bias in contingent valuation surveys concerning environmental non-market goods: an empirical investigation using an online panel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this