Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer

Martin Lund; Thomas Abramovitz Bjerre; Henning Grønbaek; Frank Mortensen; Per Kragh Andersen

doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012388

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer

Martin Lund^*, Thomas Abramovitz Bjerre, Henning Grønbaek, Frank Mortensen, Per Kragh Andersen

^*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the accuracy of CEUS, CECT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET-CT for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly-diagnosed colorectal cancer. Potential sources of heterogeneity We will investigate the following potential sources of heterogeneity: the use of different reference standards. different ways of selecting the study populations, e.g. different inclusion and exclusion criteria. different locations of the study populations (country, state, region). age of participants in the study population. sex of participants in the study population. differences in clinician skills for the performance of CEUS.

Original language	English
Article number	CD012388
Journal	Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Volume	2016
Issue number	10
Number of pages	18
ISSN	1361-6137
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012388
Publication status	Published - 10 Oct 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1002/14651858.CD012388

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Lund, M., Bjerre, T. A., Grønbaek, H., Mortensen, F., & Kragh Andersen, P. (2016). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(10), Article CD012388. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012388

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. / Lund, Martin; Bjerre, Thomas Abramovitz; Grønbaek, Henning et al.
In: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. 2016, No. 10, CD012388, 10.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Lund, M, Bjerre, TA, Grønbaek, H, Mortensen, F & Kragh Andersen, P 2016, 'Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2016, no. 10, CD012388. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012388

Lund M, Bjerre TA, Grønbaek H, Mortensen F, Kragh Andersen P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016 Oct 10;2016(10):CD012388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012388

@article{6444891c065241fdb540cb3a7ff9310c,

title = "Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer",

abstract = "This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the accuracy of CEUS, CECT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET-CT for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly-diagnosed colorectal cancer. Potential sources of heterogeneity We will investigate the following potential sources of heterogeneity: the use of different reference standards. different ways of selecting the study populations, e.g. different inclusion and exclusion criteria. different locations of the study populations (country, state, region). age of participants in the study population. sex of participants in the study population. differences in clinician skills for the performance of CEUS.",

author = "Martin Lund and Bjerre, {Thomas Abramovitz} and Henning Gr{\o}nbaek and Frank Mortensen and {Kragh Andersen}, Per",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1002/14651858.CD012388",

language = "English",

volume = "2016",

journal = "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",

issn = "1361-6137",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer

AU - Lund, Martin

AU - Bjerre, Thomas Abramovitz

AU - Grønbaek, Henning

AU - Mortensen, Frank

AU - Kragh Andersen, Per

PY - 2016/10/10

Y1 - 2016/10/10

N2 - This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the accuracy of CEUS, CECT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET-CT for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly-diagnosed colorectal cancer. Potential sources of heterogeneity We will investigate the following potential sources of heterogeneity: the use of different reference standards. different ways of selecting the study populations, e.g. different inclusion and exclusion criteria. different locations of the study populations (country, state, region). age of participants in the study population. sex of participants in the study population. differences in clinician skills for the performance of CEUS.

AB - This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the accuracy of CEUS, CECT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET-CT for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly-diagnosed colorectal cancer. Potential sources of heterogeneity We will investigate the following potential sources of heterogeneity: the use of different reference standards. different ways of selecting the study populations, e.g. different inclusion and exclusion criteria. different locations of the study populations (country, state, region). age of participants in the study population. sex of participants in the study population. differences in clinician skills for the performance of CEUS.

U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD012388

DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD012388

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84990861347

SN - 1361-6137

VL - 2016

JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

IS - 10

M1 - CD012388

ER -