Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer

Martin Lund; Thomas Abramovitz Bjerre; Henning Grønbaek; Frank Mortensen; Per Kragh Andersen

doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012388

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer

Martin Lund^*, Thomas Abramovitz Bjerre, Henning Grønbaek, Frank Mortensen, Per Kragh Andersen

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the accuracy of CEUS, CECT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET-CT for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly-diagnosed colorectal cancer. Potential sources of heterogeneity We will investigate the following potential sources of heterogeneity: the use of different reference standards. different ways of selecting the study populations, e.g. different inclusion and exclusion criteria. different locations of the study populations (country, state, region). age of participants in the study population. sex of participants in the study population. differences in clinician skills for the performance of CEUS.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	CD012388
Tidsskrift	Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Vol/bind	2016
Udgave nummer	10
Antal sider	18
ISSN	1361-6137
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012388
Status	Udgivet - 10 okt. 2016

FN’s Verdensmål

Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1002/14651858.CD012388

Citationsformater

Lund, M., Bjerre, T. A., Grønbaek, H., Mortensen, F., & Kragh Andersen, P. (2016). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(10), [CD012388]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012388

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. / Lund, Martin; Bjerre, Thomas Abramovitz; Grønbaek, Henning et al.

I: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Bind 2016, Nr. 10, CD012388, 10.10.2016.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Lund, M, Bjerre, TA, Grønbaek, H, Mortensen, F & Kragh Andersen, P 2016, 'Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, bind 2016, nr. 10, CD012388. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012388

Lund M, Bjerre TA, Grønbaek H, Mortensen F, Kragh Andersen P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016 okt. 10;2016(10):CD012388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012388

@article{6444891c065241fdb540cb3a7ff9310c,

title = "Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer",

abstract = "This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the accuracy of CEUS, CECT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET-CT for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly-diagnosed colorectal cancer. Potential sources of heterogeneity We will investigate the following potential sources of heterogeneity: the use of different reference standards. different ways of selecting the study populations, e.g. different inclusion and exclusion criteria. different locations of the study populations (country, state, region). age of participants in the study population. sex of participants in the study population. differences in clinician skills for the performance of CEUS.",

author = "Martin Lund and Bjerre, {Thomas Abramovitz} and Henning Gr{\o}nbaek and Frank Mortensen and {Kragh Andersen}, Per",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1002/14651858.CD012388",

language = "English",

volume = "2016",

journal = "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",

issn = "1361-6137",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer

AU - Lund, Martin

AU - Bjerre, Thomas Abramovitz

AU - Grønbaek, Henning

AU - Mortensen, Frank

AU - Kragh Andersen, Per

PY - 2016/10/10

Y1 - 2016/10/10

N2 - This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the accuracy of CEUS, CECT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET-CT for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly-diagnosed colorectal cancer. Potential sources of heterogeneity We will investigate the following potential sources of heterogeneity: the use of different reference standards. different ways of selecting the study populations, e.g. different inclusion and exclusion criteria. different locations of the study populations (country, state, region). age of participants in the study population. sex of participants in the study population. differences in clinician skills for the performance of CEUS.

AB - This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To compare the accuracy of CEUS, CECT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET-CT for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly-diagnosed colorectal cancer. Potential sources of heterogeneity We will investigate the following potential sources of heterogeneity: the use of different reference standards. different ways of selecting the study populations, e.g. different inclusion and exclusion criteria. different locations of the study populations (country, state, region). age of participants in the study population. sex of participants in the study population. differences in clinician skills for the performance of CEUS.

U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD012388

DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD012388

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84990861347

SN - 1361-6137

VL - 2016

JO - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

JF - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

IS - 10

M1 - CD012388

ER -

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography for diagnosing liver metastases in people with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer

Abstract

FN’s Verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater