Considering adaptive genetic variation in climate change vulnerability assessment reduces species range loss projections

Orly Razgour, Brenna Forester, John B. Taggart, Michaël Bekaert, Javier Juste, Carlos Ibáñez, Sébastien J. Puechmaille, Roberto Novella-Fernandez, Antton Alberdi, Stéphanie Manel

    82 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Local adaptations can determine the potential of populations to respond to environmental changes, yet adaptive genetic variation is commonly ignored in models forecasting species vulnerability and biogeographical shifts under future climate change. Here we integrate genomic and ecological modeling approaches to identify genetic adaptations associated with climate in two cryptic forest bats. We then incorporate this information directly into forecasts of range changes under future climate change and assessment of population persistence through the spread of climate-adaptive genetic variation (evolutionary rescue potential). Considering climate-adaptive potential reduced range loss projections, suggesting that failure to account for intraspecific variability can result in overestimation of future losses. On the other hand, range overlap between species was projected to increase, indicating that interspecific competition is likely to play an important role in limiting species’ future ranges. We show that although evolutionary rescue is possible, it depends on a population’s adaptive capacity and connectivity. Hence, we stress the importance of incorporating genomic data and landscape connectivity in climate change vulnerability assessments and conservation management.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    Volume116
    Issue number21
    Pages (from-to)10418-10423
    Number of pages6
    ISSN0027-8424
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Considering adaptive genetic variation in climate change vulnerability assessment reduces species range loss projections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this