Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques

Md N. Haque*, Hanne H. Hansen, Ida M.L.D. Storm, Jørgen Madsen

*Corresponding author for this work
    7 Citations (Scopus)
    68 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The objective of this study was to compare the precision of CH4 estimates using calculated CO2 (HP) by the CO2 method (CO2T) and measured CO2 in the respiration chamber (CO2R). The CO2R and CO2T study was conducted as a 3 × 3 Latin square design where 3 Dexter heifers were allocated to metabolic cages for 3 periods. Each period consisted of 2 weeks of adaptation followed by 1 week of measurement with the CO2R and CO2T. The average body weight of the heifer was 226 ± 11 kg (means ± SD). They were fed a total mixed ration, twice daily, with 1 of 3 supplements: wheat (W), molasses (M), or molasses mixed with sodium bicarbonate (Mbic). The dry mater intake (DMI; kg/day) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) in the metabolic cage compared with that in the respiration chamber. The daily CH4 (L/day) emission was strongly correlated (r = 0.78) between CO2T and CO2R. The daily CH4 (L/kg DMI) emission by the CO2T was in the same magnitude as by the CO2R. The measured CO2 (L/day) production in the respiration chamber was not different (P = 0.39) from the calculated CO2 production using the CO2T. This result concludes a reasonable accuracy and precision of CH4 estimation by the CO2T compared with the CO2R.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalAnimal Nutrition
    Volume3
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)175-179
    Number of pages5
    ISSN2405-6545
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

    Keywords

    • Carbon dioxide
    • Measurement
    • Methane
    • Precision
    • Respiration chamber

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative methane estimation from cattle based on total CO2 production using different techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this