Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation

4 Citations (Scopus)
130 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The present paper proposes an integrative account of social forms of practical irrationality and corresponding disruptions of individual and group-level emotion regulation (ER). I will especially focus on disruptions in ER by means of collaborative agential and doxastic akrasia. I begin by distinguishing mutual, communal and collaborative forms of akrasia. Such a taxonomy seems all the more needed as, rather surprisingly, in the face of huge philosophical interest in analysing the possibility, structure, and mechanisms of individual practical irrationality, with very little exception, there are no comparable accounts of social and collaborative cases. However, I believe that, if it is true that individual akrasia is, in the long run, harmful for those who entertain it, this is even more so in social contexts. I will illustrate this point by drawing on various small group settings, and explore a number of socio-psychological mechanisms underlying collaborative irrationality, in particular groupthink. Specifically, I suggest that in collaborative cases there is what I call a spiraling of practical irrationality at play. I will argue that this is typically correlated and indeed partly due to biases in individual members' affect control and eventually the group's with whom the members identify.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume7
Issue number2002
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages18
ISSN1664-1078
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Faculty of Humanities
  • collaborative irrationality
  • emotion regulation and dysregulation
  • emotional co-regulation
  • interpersonal emotion regulation
  • akrasia
  • self-deception
  • groupthink
  • group identification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this