Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics:: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems

Alexandra Huneeus; Mikael Rask Madsen

doi:10.1093/icon/moy011

Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems

Alexandra Huneeus, Mikael Rask Madsen

Centre of Excellence for International Courts and Governance

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article represents a first systematic attempt to compare the institutional histories of the regional human rights systems in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. It argues that the three main regional human rights systems have enacted common scripts that have produced relatively similar institutional models across the regions under scrutiny. This is not to deny, however, the enormous variation among the systems; nor is it to deny the role of local social and political contexts in shaping them. Rather, the analysis seeks precisely to identify both the common institutional scripts and the regional particularities to render the general history of regional human rights courts and commissions-a key component of the larger history of human rights that has been largely overlooked in current debates. We argue that the dynamics of the Cold War initially shaped the bounds within which actors in each region came to realize, re-shape, and re-signify common institutional scripts.

Original language	English
Journal	International Journal of Constitutional Law
Volume	16
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	136-160
Number of pages	25
ISSN	1474-2640
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy011
Publication status	Published - 2018

Access to Document

10.1093/icon/moy011

moy011.pdfFinal published version, 224 KB

Cite this

@article{6ce13db45dda4f48a1d51b92468a8a50,

title = "Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics:: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems",

abstract = "This article represents a first systematic attempt to compare the institutional histories of the regional human rights systems in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. It argues that the three main regional human rights systems have enacted common scripts that have produced relatively similar institutional models across the regions under scrutiny. This is not to deny, however, the enormous variation among the systems; nor is it to deny the role of local social and political contexts in shaping them. Rather, the analysis seeks precisely to identify both the common institutional scripts and the regional particularities to render the general history of regional human rights courts and commissions-a key component of the larger history of human rights that has been largely overlooked in current debates. We argue that the dynamics of the Cold War initially shaped the bounds within which actors in each region came to realize, re-shape, and re-signify common institutional scripts.",

author = "Alexandra Huneeus and Madsen, {Mikael Rask}",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1093/icon/moy011",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

pages = "136--160",

journal = "International Journal of Constitutional Law",

issn = "1474-2640",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics:

T2 - A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems

AU - Huneeus, Alexandra

AU - Madsen, Mikael Rask

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article represents a first systematic attempt to compare the institutional histories of the regional human rights systems in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. It argues that the three main regional human rights systems have enacted common scripts that have produced relatively similar institutional models across the regions under scrutiny. This is not to deny, however, the enormous variation among the systems; nor is it to deny the role of local social and political contexts in shaping them. Rather, the analysis seeks precisely to identify both the common institutional scripts and the regional particularities to render the general history of regional human rights courts and commissions-a key component of the larger history of human rights that has been largely overlooked in current debates. We argue that the dynamics of the Cold War initially shaped the bounds within which actors in each region came to realize, re-shape, and re-signify common institutional scripts.

AB - This article represents a first systematic attempt to compare the institutional histories of the regional human rights systems in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. It argues that the three main regional human rights systems have enacted common scripts that have produced relatively similar institutional models across the regions under scrutiny. This is not to deny, however, the enormous variation among the systems; nor is it to deny the role of local social and political contexts in shaping them. Rather, the analysis seeks precisely to identify both the common institutional scripts and the regional particularities to render the general history of regional human rights courts and commissions-a key component of the larger history of human rights that has been largely overlooked in current debates. We argue that the dynamics of the Cold War initially shaped the bounds within which actors in each region came to realize, re-shape, and re-signify common institutional scripts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048112827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/icon/moy011

DO - 10.1093/icon/moy011

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1474-2640

VL - 16

SP - 136

EP - 160

JO - International Journal of Constitutional Law

JF - International Journal of Constitutional Law

IS - 1

ER -

Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this