Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems

Alexandra Huneeus, Mikael Rask Madsen

10 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

This article represents a first systematic attempt to compare the institutional histories of the regional human rights systems in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. It argues that the three main regional human rights systems have enacted common scripts that have produced relatively similar institutional models across the regions under scrutiny. This is not to deny, however, the enormous variation among the systems; nor is it to deny the role of local social and political contexts in shaping them. Rather, the analysis seeks precisely to identify both the common institutional scripts and the regional particularities to render the general history of regional human rights courts and commissions-a key component of the larger history of human rights that has been largely overlooked in current debates. We argue that the dynamics of the Cold War initially shaped the bounds within which actors in each region came to realize, re-shape, and re-signify common institutional scripts.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Constitutional Law
Vol/bind16
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)136-160
Antal sider25
ISSN1474-2640
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater