Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys

Jacob Ladenburg, Søren Bøye Olsen

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothetical bias continues to be a major challenge for stated preference methods. Cheap Talk (CT) has been found to be an effective remedy in some applications, though empirical results are ambiguous. We discuss reasons why CT may fail to effectively remove specific types of hypothetical bias in Choice Experiments. We suggest augmenting CT in Choice Experiments with a so-called Opt-Out Reminder (OOR). Prior to each choice set, the OOR explicitly instructs respondents to choose the opt-out alternative, if they find the experimentally designed alternatives too expensive. In an empirical survey we find the OOR to significantly reduce total WTP and to some extent also marginal WTP beyond the capability of the CT applied without the OOR. This suggests that the CT practice should be adapted to fit the potentially different decision processes and repeated choices structure of the Choice Experiment format, rather than merely being adopted directly from Contingent Valuation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalResource and Energy Economics
Volume37
Pages (from-to)39-63
Number of pages25
ISSN0928-7655
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

Keywords

  • Cheap Talk
  • Opt-Out Reminder
  • Choice Experiments
  • Hypothetical bias
  • Stream re-establishment
  • Opt-out effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Augmenting short cheap talk scripts with a repeated opt-out reminder in choice experiment surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this