Adult height is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study

Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group

6 Citations (Scopus)
27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest greater height is associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, but cannot exclude bias and/or confounding as explanations for this. Mendelian randomisation (MR) can provide evidence which may be less prone to bias.

METHODS: We pooled data from 39 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium studies (16,395 cases; 23,003 controls). We applied two-stage predictor-substitution MR, using a weighted genetic risk score combining 609 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted height and risk were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS: Greater genetically predicted height was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk overall (pooled-OR (pOR) = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11 per 5 cm increase in height), and separately for invasive (pOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and borderline (pOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.29) tumours.

CONCLUSIONS: Women with a genetic propensity to being taller have increased risk of ovarian cancer. This suggests genes influencing height are involved in pathways promoting ovarian carcinogenesis.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume118
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1123-1129
Number of pages7
ISSN0007-0920
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Body Height/genetics
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/epidemiology
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Female
  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease
  • Geography
  • Humans
  • Mendelian Randomization Analysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology
  • Risk Factors
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adult height is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this