A Right Against Risk Imposition and the Problem of Paralysis

3 Citations (Scopus)
79 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper I examine the prospects for a rights-based approach to the morality of pure risk-imposition. In particular, I discuss a practical challenge to proponents of the thesis that we have a right against being imposed a risk of harm. According to an influential criticism, a right against risk-imposition will rule out all ordinary activities. The paper examines two strategies that rights theorists may follow in response to this “Paralysis Problem”. The first strategy introduces a threshold for when a risk-imposition is a rights violation. The second strategy drops the claim that rights are absolute and maintains that all rights infringements generate compensation duties. It is argued that both strategies face significant practical problems of their own and that the Paralysis Problem seems fatal for a right against risk-imposition in the absence of an adequate account of the morally relevant threshold risk.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEthical Theory and Moral Practice
Volume19
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)917-930
Number of pages14
ISSN1386-2820
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

Keywords

  • Faculty of Humanities
  • Ethics
  • Compensation
  • Consent
  • Rigths
  • Risk
  • Threshold

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Right Against Risk Imposition and the Problem of Paralysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this