A review of instruments developed to measure food neophobia

    41 Citations (Scopus)
    150 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background Food choices are influenced by an individual's attitude towards foods. Food neophobia may be associated with less variety of diets, inadequate nutrient intake and high product failure rate for new food products entering the market. To quantify the extent of these challenges, instruments to measure the food neophobia in different target groups are needed. Several such instruments with significantly different measurement outcomes and procedures have been developed. This review provides an overview and discusses strengths and weaknesses of these instruments. Objective We evaluate strengths and weaknesses of previously developed instruments to measure neophobia and willingness to try unfamiliar foods. Design Literature was searched through the databases Web of Science and Google Scholar. We identified 255 studies concerning neophobia and willingness to try unfamiliar foods. Of these, 13 studies encompassing 13 instruments to measure neophobia and willingness to try unfamiliar foods were included in the review. Results are summarized and evaluated with a narrative approach. Results In the 13 instruments to assess neophobia and willingness to try unfamiliar foods, 113 to 16.644 subjects aged 2–65 years were involved, scales with 3–7 response categories were used and behavioral validation tests were included in 6 studies. Conclusions Several instruments to measure neophobia and willingness to try unfamiliar foods exist. We recommend selecting one or more among the 13 instruments reviewed in this paper to assess relevant aspects of neophobia.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalAppetite
    Volume113
    Pages (from-to)358-367
    Number of pages10
    ISSN0195-6663
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A review of instruments developed to measure food neophobia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this