Description
Interview with leading science journalist regarding controversial CJEU decision on the regulation of GMOs and gene editing technology.
Subject
The controversial decision by the European courts last summer to regulate gene edited organisms as GMOs has already had a damaging effect on European biotechs working in this area. Many believe it could have been prevented through a better dialogue between scientists, legal experts and the general public, but whether the long term effects of the decision can be mitigated using this approach remains to be seen.
| Period | 27 Feb 2019 |
|---|
Keywords
- gene editing
- regulation
- EU
Related content
-
Research output
-
Cutting edges and weaving threads in the gene editing (Я)evolution: reconciling scientific progress with legal, ethical, and social concerns
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
Clearing a way through the CRISPR patent jungle
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research
-
Will the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal hear the Broad's CRISPR case?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
The Impact of Broccoli II & Tomato II on European patents in conventional breeding, GMO’s and Synthetic Biology: The grand finale of a juicy European patents tale?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review