Beskrivelse
Interview with leading science journalist regarding controversial CJEU decision on the regulation of GMOs and gene editing technology.
Emne
The controversial decision by the European courts last summer to regulate gene edited organisms as GMOs has already had a damaging effect on European biotechs working in this area. Many believe it could have been prevented through a better dialogue between scientists, legal experts and the general public, but whether the long term effects of the decision can be mitigated using this approach remains to be seen.
| Periode | 27 feb. 2019 |
|---|
Relateret indhold
-
Publikation
-
Cutting edges and weaving threads in the gene editing (Я)evolution: reconciling scientific progress with legal, ethical, and social concerns
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
-
Clearing a way through the CRISPR patent jungle
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning
-
Will the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal hear the Broad's CRISPR case?
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
-
The Impact of Broccoli II & Tomato II on European patents in conventional breeding, GMO’s and Synthetic Biology: The grand finale of a juicy European patents tale?
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review