Zechariah and the Dating of Biblical Hebrew

Martin Gustaf Ehrensvärd

Zechariah and the Dating of Biblical Hebrew

Bidragets oversatte titel: Zechariah and the Dating of Biblical Hebrew

Afdeling for bibelsk eksegese

Abstract

The data presented in the article indicate clearly that the ability to write proper EBH did not end with the exile; but when did it end? In the course of the fifth century, or the fourth century, or even later? This is difficult to resolve, on linguistic grounds. On linguistic grounds, can we say that P and parts of Jeremiah are unlikely to stem from, say, the fifth century? No. On linguistic grounds, can we say that redactors and scribes are unlikely to have revised and expanded EBH texts in the centuries following the exile? No. To say that they did not do so would contradict the conventional conclusions of most biblical scholars.
Considering only linguistic data, texts in EBH could have been composed after the exile. Other, non-linguistic considerations can make this unlikely, but we can raise no objections from a linguistic viewpoint to such a dating.

Bidragets oversatte titel	Zechariah and the Dating of Biblical Hebrew
Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Hebrew Studies
Vol/bind	47
Sider (fra-til)	78-89
Antal sider	12
ISSN	0146-4094
Status	Udgivet - 2006

Citationsformater

@article{ae2b4b785afc4f0e850ca40a05d2e722,

title = "Zechariah and the Dating of Biblical Hebrew",

abstract = "The data presented in the article indicate clearly that the ability to write proper EBH did not end with the exile; but when did it end? In the course of the fifth century, or the fourth century, or even later? This is difficult to resolve, on linguistic grounds. On linguistic grounds, can we say that P and parts of Jeremiah are unlikely to stem from, say, the fifth century? No. On linguistic grounds, can we say that redactors and scribes are unlikely to have revised and expanded EBH texts in the centuries following the exile? No. To say that they did not do so would contradict the conventional conclusions of most biblical scholars. Considering only linguistic data, texts in EBH could have been composed after the exile. Other, non-linguistic considerations can make this unlikely, but we can raise no objections from a linguistic viewpoint to such a dating. ",

author = "Ehrensv{\"a}rd, {Martin Gustaf}",

year = "2006",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

pages = "78--89",

journal = "Hebrew Studies",

issn = "0146-4094",

publisher = "University of Wisconsin",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zechariah and the Dating of Biblical Hebrew

AU - Ehrensvärd, Martin Gustaf

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The data presented in the article indicate clearly that the ability to write proper EBH did not end with the exile; but when did it end? In the course of the fifth century, or the fourth century, or even later? This is difficult to resolve, on linguistic grounds. On linguistic grounds, can we say that P and parts of Jeremiah are unlikely to stem from, say, the fifth century? No. On linguistic grounds, can we say that redactors and scribes are unlikely to have revised and expanded EBH texts in the centuries following the exile? No. To say that they did not do so would contradict the conventional conclusions of most biblical scholars. Considering only linguistic data, texts in EBH could have been composed after the exile. Other, non-linguistic considerations can make this unlikely, but we can raise no objections from a linguistic viewpoint to such a dating.

AB - The data presented in the article indicate clearly that the ability to write proper EBH did not end with the exile; but when did it end? In the course of the fifth century, or the fourth century, or even later? This is difficult to resolve, on linguistic grounds. On linguistic grounds, can we say that P and parts of Jeremiah are unlikely to stem from, say, the fifth century? No. On linguistic grounds, can we say that redactors and scribes are unlikely to have revised and expanded EBH texts in the centuries following the exile? No. To say that they did not do so would contradict the conventional conclusions of most biblical scholars. Considering only linguistic data, texts in EBH could have been composed after the exile. Other, non-linguistic considerations can make this unlikely, but we can raise no objections from a linguistic viewpoint to such a dating.

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0146-4094

VL - 47

SP - 78

EP - 89

JO - Hebrew Studies

JF - Hebrew Studies

ER -