Negative supervisionsoplevelser og deres konsekvenser: om evaluering og devaluering i supervision

Jan Nielsen

Negative supervisionsoplevelser og deres konsekvenser: om evaluering og devaluering i supervision

Abstract

Abstract
Starting from the paradox between the controlling-evaluative and supportative-developmental aspects of supervision, this paper examines evaluation in supervision by a short example, research and reviews of literature, and by means of the author´s own, recently gathered experiences in evaluation.

First part of the paper explores negative experience in supervision in general. The second part, focusing on negative experience in supervision caused by evaluation, is explored and discussed in relation to the key concept of supervisory alliance (Bordin, 1983), perceiving evaluation as the ‘stress-test’ of the alliance. A model for evaluation is presented and the authors own examples related to this are presented. A discussion of non-disclosure in supervision follows (Ladany et al. 1996) and is connected to the supervisory alliance and evaluation.

The conclusion is, supported by research, that especially training of supervisors is needed, to improve the complex and crucial discipline of evaluating supervisees.

Originalsprog	Dansk
Tidsskrift	Matrix
Vol/bind	28
Udgave nummer	4
Sider (fra-til)	273-294
Antal sider	22
ISSN	0109-646X
Status	Udgivet - 2011

Citationsformater

@article{3b5d06d4416d46f6b334e92acad940ab,

title = "Negative supervisionsoplevelser og deres konsekvenser: om evaluering og devaluering i supervision",

abstract = "Abstract Starting from the paradox between the controlling-evaluative and supportative-developmental aspects of supervision, this paper examines evaluation in supervision by a short example, research and reviews of literature, and by means of the author´s own, recently gathered experiences in evaluation. First part of the paper explores negative experience in supervision in general. The second part, focusing on negative experience in supervision caused by evaluation, is explored and discussed in relation to the key concept of supervisory alliance (Bordin, 1983), perceiving evaluation as the {\textquoteleft}stress-test{\textquoteright} of the alliance. A model for evaluation is presented and the authors own examples related to this are presented. A discussion of non-disclosure in supervision follows (Ladany et al. 1996) and is connected to the supervisory alliance and evaluation. The conclusion is, supported by research, that especially training of supervisors is needed, to improve the complex and crucial discipline of evaluating supervisees. ",

author = "Jan Nielsen",

year = "2011",

language = "Dansk",

volume = "28",

pages = "273--294",

journal = "Matrix",

issn = "0109-646X",

publisher = "Dansk Psykologisk Forlag",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negative supervisionsoplevelser og deres konsekvenser

T2 - om evaluering og devaluering i supervision

AU - Nielsen, Jan

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Abstract Starting from the paradox between the controlling-evaluative and supportative-developmental aspects of supervision, this paper examines evaluation in supervision by a short example, research and reviews of literature, and by means of the author´s own, recently gathered experiences in evaluation. First part of the paper explores negative experience in supervision in general. The second part, focusing on negative experience in supervision caused by evaluation, is explored and discussed in relation to the key concept of supervisory alliance (Bordin, 1983), perceiving evaluation as the ‘stress-test’ of the alliance. A model for evaluation is presented and the authors own examples related to this are presented. A discussion of non-disclosure in supervision follows (Ladany et al. 1996) and is connected to the supervisory alliance and evaluation. The conclusion is, supported by research, that especially training of supervisors is needed, to improve the complex and crucial discipline of evaluating supervisees.

AB - Abstract Starting from the paradox between the controlling-evaluative and supportative-developmental aspects of supervision, this paper examines evaluation in supervision by a short example, research and reviews of literature, and by means of the author´s own, recently gathered experiences in evaluation. First part of the paper explores negative experience in supervision in general. The second part, focusing on negative experience in supervision caused by evaluation, is explored and discussed in relation to the key concept of supervisory alliance (Bordin, 1983), perceiving evaluation as the ‘stress-test’ of the alliance. A model for evaluation is presented and the authors own examples related to this are presented. A discussion of non-disclosure in supervision follows (Ladany et al. 1996) and is connected to the supervisory alliance and evaluation. The conclusion is, supported by research, that especially training of supervisors is needed, to improve the complex and crucial discipline of evaluating supervisees.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

SN - 0109-646X

VL - 28

SP - 273

EP - 294

JO - Matrix

JF - Matrix

IS - 4

ER -