Abstract
In this paper we investigate the position of a review network within a research specialty; the network of scholars who write reviews of their colleagues' work. This is one of the voluntary activities that researchers perform as a prerequisite for the functioning of the invisible college. We compare this network to other networks within the specialty, and this allows us to distinguish various roles: stars, influentials, members, supporters and juniors. As scholars are characterized by different role-configurations, the invisible college becomes stratified. We discuss the implications for the development of a referee factor and review factor, norms for refereeing and reviewing, and the development of systems-based research evaluations.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Publikationsdato | 1 jan. 2007 |
Antal sider | 11 |
Status | Udgivet - 1 jan. 2007 |
Begivenhed | 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2007 - Madrid, Spanien Varighed: 25 jun. 2007 → 27 jun. 2007 |
Konference
Konference | 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2007 |
---|---|
Land/Område | Spanien |
By | Madrid |
Periode | 25/06/2007 → 27/06/2007 |