Gender fairness in self-efficacy? A Rasch-based validity study of the General Academic Self-efficacy scale (GASE)

    6 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Studies have reported gender differences in academic self-efficacy. However, how and if academic self-efficacy questionnaires are gender-biased has not been psychometrically investigated. The psychometric properties of a general version of The Physics Self-Efficacy Questionnaire – the General Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (GASE) – were analyzed using Rasch measurement models, with data from 1018 Danish university students (psychology and technical), focusing on gender invariance and the sufficiency of the score. The short 4-item GASE scale was found to be essentially objective and construct valid and satisfactorily reliable, though differential item functioning was found relative to gender and academic discipline, and can be used to assess students’ general academic self-efficacy. Research on gender and self-efficacy needs to take gender into account and equate scores appropriately for unbiased analysis within academic disciplines.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Educational Research
    Vol/bind62
    Udgave nummer5
    Sider (fra-til)664-681
    Antal sider18
    ISSN0031-3831
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 20 aug. 2018

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Gender fairness in self-efficacy? A Rasch-based validity study of the General Academic Self-efficacy scale (GASE)'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater