An Unsettling Divide in Linguistic Dating and Historical Linguistics

Martin Gustaf Ehrensvärd; Robert Rezetko; Ian Young

An Unsettling Divide in Linguistic Dating and Historical Linguistics

Bidragets oversatte titel: Et ubehageligt skisma inden for lingvistisk datering og historisk lingvistik

Martin Gustaf Ehrensvärd, Robert Rezetko, Ian Young

Afdeling for bibelsk eksegese

Abstract

Most ancient Hebrew language scholars probably agree broadly about what scholarship and scholarly method are and should be. They agree that scholarship entails dialogue, debate, self-criticism, evaluation, correction, and so on. But when it comes down to how this looks in practice, misunderstandings have become abundant and a very unfortunate situation has developed in the field.

Bidragets oversatte titel	Et ubehageligt skisma inden for lingvistisk datering og historisk lingvistik
Originalsprog	Engelsk
Publikationsdato	15 feb. 2016
Status	Udgivet - 15 feb. 2016

Adgang til dokumentet

http://bibleinterp.com/opeds/2016/02/ehr408024.shtml

Citationsformater

@misc{5d987c12c3f24377a3d0b85abcfa256c,

title = "An Unsettling Divide in Linguistic Dating and Historical Linguistics",

abstract = "Most ancient Hebrew language scholars probably agree broadly about what scholarship and scholarly method are and should be. They agree that scholarship entails dialogue, debate, self-criticism, evaluation, correction, and so on. But when it comes down to how this looks in practice, misunderstandings have become abundant and a very unfortunate situation has developed in the field.",

author = "Ehrensv{\"a}rd, {Martin Gustaf} and Robert Rezetko and Ian Young",

year = "2016",

month = feb,

day = "15",

language = "English",

type = "Other",

}

TY - ICOMM

T1 - An Unsettling Divide in Linguistic Dating and Historical Linguistics

AU - Ehrensvärd, Martin Gustaf

AU - Rezetko, Robert

AU - Young, Ian

PY - 2016/2/15

Y1 - 2016/2/15

N2 - Most ancient Hebrew language scholars probably agree broadly about what scholarship and scholarly method are and should be. They agree that scholarship entails dialogue, debate, self-criticism, evaluation, correction, and so on. But when it comes down to how this looks in practice, misunderstandings have become abundant and a very unfortunate situation has developed in the field.

AB - Most ancient Hebrew language scholars probably agree broadly about what scholarship and scholarly method are and should be. They agree that scholarship entails dialogue, debate, self-criticism, evaluation, correction, and so on. But when it comes down to how this looks in practice, misunderstandings have become abundant and a very unfortunate situation has developed in the field.

M3 - Net publication - Internet publication

ER -