Why socio-political borders and boundaries matter in conservation

Martin Dallimer, Niels Strange

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Acting to demarcate the spatial limits of decision-making processes, socio-political boundaries are an inevitable part of a human-dominated world. Rarely coincident with ecological boundaries, and thus having no ecological functional role by themselves, they nevertheless impose substantial costs on biodiversity and ecosystem conservation by fragmenting ownership, governance, and management. Where boundaries are in place, a lack of coordination on either side of a boundary affects the efficiency and efficacy of ecosystem management. We suggest four research pathways which will enhance our ability to address the adverse effects of socio-political borders on conservation: (i) scale-matching, (ii) quantification of the mutual economic benefits of conservation across boundaries, (iii) determining transboundary societal values, and (iv) acknowledging the importance of stakeholder behaviour and incentives.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTrends in Ecology & Evolution
Volume30
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)132-139
Number of pages8
ISSN0169-5347
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015

Keywords

  • ecosystem services
  • biodiversity
  • transnational cooperation
  • socio-ecological systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why socio-political borders and boundaries matter in conservation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this