Why Mycophoris is not an orchid seedling, and why Synaptomitus is not a fungal symbiont within this fossil

Marc-Andre Selosse, Mark Brundrett, John Dearnaley, Vincent S. F. T. Merckx, Finn N. Rasmussen, Lawrence W. Zettler, Hanne Nina Rasmussen

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent publication in Botany introduced two new taxa: a fossil orchid seed (Mycophoris) and a fossilized basidiomycete fungus (Synaptomitus) in an alleged relationship with this orchid, encased in 15–20 million year old Dominican amber (Poinar, G. 2017. Two new genera, Mycophoris gen. nov., (Orchidaceae) and Synaptomitus gen. nov. (Basidiomycota) based on a fossil seed with developing embryo and associated fungus in Dominican amber. Botany, 95: 1–8). From the working knowledge of extant orchid seeds, seedlings, and mycorrhiza shared among us, we cannot support these interpretations. Here we analyse: (i) why Mycophoris may not be an orchid seed, (ii) why Mycophoris is not a germinating seed, (iii) why fungal hyphae and a symbiotic fungus are absent in Mycophoris, and (iv) why Synaptomitus is likely not a fossil basidiomycete.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBotany
Volume95
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)865-868
Number of pages4
ISSN1916-2790
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Mycophoris is not an orchid seedling, and why Synaptomitus is not a fungal symbiont within this fossil'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this