Abstract
Contrary to Kierkegaards words about living history forwards, although writing it backwards, biblical scholars have followed a different path, not understanding the implications of writing history backwards. Instead they have seen the biblical history as if it was written as a running commentary on the fate of ancient Israel as history progressed. Israels history as told by Old Testament historiographers is not reflecting the progress of history; it is cultural memory constructing this history backwards and building on institutional models present in the time of these historiographers, such as the Greek amphictyony. Thus Martin Noth was after all right: Israel is reconstructed as an amphictyony in biblical historiography, although there never was an Israelite amphictyony in the real world.
Translated title of the contribution | Når slutningen er begyndelsen: Skabelsen af en national historie |
---|---|
Original language | English |
Journal | Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 22-32 |
Number of pages | 11 |
ISSN | 0901-8328 |
Publication status | Published - 2 Jan 2015 |
Keywords
- Faculty of Theology