'What's the use of It?': Danish strategic culture and the utility of armed force

Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen

doi:10.1177/0010836705049735

'What's the use of It?': Danish strategic culture and the utility of armed force

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article uses theories of strategic culture to show why Denmark has come to regard the use of armed force in new ways following the end of the Cold War. It is argued that Danish strategic culture is constituted by a debate between 'cosmopolitans' and 'defencists' about the utility of armed force. The debate shows that a minor power possesses a certain ability to choose how to act on the world stage, and what means to use in doing so, and illustrates that the prevalent structural explanations of why Danish foreign policy has been 'militarized' since the end of the Cold War are insufficient. In Denmark, a new focus on European integration and globalization has meant that military power is being understood in a new way. A practice of 'activism' has transcended the cosmopolitan-defencist debate that paralysed Danish security discourse in the late 1970s and 1980s.

Original language	English
Journal	Cooperation and Conflict
Volume	40
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	67-89
Number of pages	23
ISSN	0010-8367
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836705049735
Publication status	Published - 2005

Access to Document

10.1177/0010836705049735

Cite this

@article{5bb0a6b074c311dbbee902004c4f4f50,

title = "'What's the use of It?': Danish strategic culture and the utility of armed force",

abstract = "The article uses theories of strategic culture to show why Denmark has come to regard the use of armed force in new ways following the end of the Cold War. It is argued that Danish strategic culture is constituted by a debate between 'cosmopolitans' and 'defencists' about the utility of armed force. The debate shows that a minor power possesses a certain ability to choose how to act on the world stage, and what means to use in doing so, and illustrates that the prevalent structural explanations of why Danish foreign policy has been 'militarized' since the end of the Cold War are insufficient. In Denmark, a new focus on European integration and globalization has meant that military power is being understood in a new way. A practice of 'activism' has transcended the cosmopolitan-defencist debate that paralysed Danish security discourse in the late 1970s and 1980s.",

author = "Rasmussen, {Mikkel Vedby}",

year = "2005",

doi = "10.1177/0010836705049735",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "67--89",

journal = "Cooperation and Conflict",

issn = "0010-8367",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'What's the use of It?'

T2 - Danish strategic culture and the utility of armed force

AU - Rasmussen, Mikkel Vedby

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The article uses theories of strategic culture to show why Denmark has come to regard the use of armed force in new ways following the end of the Cold War. It is argued that Danish strategic culture is constituted by a debate between 'cosmopolitans' and 'defencists' about the utility of armed force. The debate shows that a minor power possesses a certain ability to choose how to act on the world stage, and what means to use in doing so, and illustrates that the prevalent structural explanations of why Danish foreign policy has been 'militarized' since the end of the Cold War are insufficient. In Denmark, a new focus on European integration and globalization has meant that military power is being understood in a new way. A practice of 'activism' has transcended the cosmopolitan-defencist debate that paralysed Danish security discourse in the late 1970s and 1980s.

AB - The article uses theories of strategic culture to show why Denmark has come to regard the use of armed force in new ways following the end of the Cold War. It is argued that Danish strategic culture is constituted by a debate between 'cosmopolitans' and 'defencists' about the utility of armed force. The debate shows that a minor power possesses a certain ability to choose how to act on the world stage, and what means to use in doing so, and illustrates that the prevalent structural explanations of why Danish foreign policy has been 'militarized' since the end of the Cold War are insufficient. In Denmark, a new focus on European integration and globalization has meant that military power is being understood in a new way. A practice of 'activism' has transcended the cosmopolitan-defencist debate that paralysed Danish security discourse in the late 1970s and 1980s.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144509664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0010836705049735

DO - 10.1177/0010836705049735

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:27144509664

SN - 0010-8367

VL - 40

SP - 67

EP - 89

JO - Cooperation and Conflict

JF - Cooperation and Conflict

IS - 1

ER -

'What's the use of It?': Danish strategic culture and the utility of armed force

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this