TY - JOUR
T1 - Volume estimation of the aortic sac after EVAR using 3-D ultrasound - a novel, accurate and promising technique
AU - Bredahl, K
AU - Long, A
AU - Taudorf, M
AU - Lönn, L
AU - Rouet, L
AU - Ardon, R
AU - Sillesen, H
AU - Eiberg, J P
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - Objectives: Volume estimation is more sensitive than diameter measurement for detection of aneurysm growth after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), but this has only been confirmed on three-dimensional, reconstructed computer tomography (3-D CT). The potential of 3-D ultrasound (3-D US) for volume estimation in EVAR surveillance is unknown. Design: Prospective validation study comparing 3-D US with 3-D CT, using 3-D CT as the gold standard. Materials and methods: From August 2011 to March 2012, 93 consecutive EVAR patients were enrolled and examined with both 3-D US and CT angiography (CTA). Image data were analysed in a mutual blinded setup using a 3-D interactive segmentation technique. Results: The technical success rate of 3D-US was 98% (91/93). In 91 EVAR patients (F/M; 10/81) eligible for further analysis, the mean maximum volume (SD) was 126 (58) ml using 3-D US and 128 (58) ml using 3-D CT. The mean difference was 1 ml (0.4%) and the limits of agreement were -14 to 16 ml (-11; 12%). Conclusion: Volume estimation of the aortic sac after EVAR using 3-D US is a feasible and accurate method using 3-D CT as the gold standard.
AB - Objectives: Volume estimation is more sensitive than diameter measurement for detection of aneurysm growth after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), but this has only been confirmed on three-dimensional, reconstructed computer tomography (3-D CT). The potential of 3-D ultrasound (3-D US) for volume estimation in EVAR surveillance is unknown. Design: Prospective validation study comparing 3-D US with 3-D CT, using 3-D CT as the gold standard. Materials and methods: From August 2011 to March 2012, 93 consecutive EVAR patients were enrolled and examined with both 3-D US and CT angiography (CTA). Image data were analysed in a mutual blinded setup using a 3-D interactive segmentation technique. Results: The technical success rate of 3D-US was 98% (91/93). In 91 EVAR patients (F/M; 10/81) eligible for further analysis, the mean maximum volume (SD) was 126 (58) ml using 3-D US and 128 (58) ml using 3-D CT. The mean difference was 1 ml (0.4%) and the limits of agreement were -14 to 16 ml (-11; 12%). Conclusion: Volume estimation of the aortic sac after EVAR using 3-D US is a feasible and accurate method using 3-D CT as the gold standard.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.018
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.018
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 23433497
SN - 1078-5884
VL - 45
SP - 450-5; discussin 456
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
IS - 5
ER -