Validity and reliability of self-assessed physical fitness using visual analogue scales.

Jesper Strøyer, Morten Essendrop, Lone Donbaek Jensen, Susan Warming, Kirsten Avlund, Bente Schibye

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To test the validity and reliability of self-assessed physical fitness samples included healthcare assistants working at a hospital (women=170, men=17), persons working with physically and mentally handicapped patients (women=530, men= 123), and two separate groups of healthcare students (a) women=91 and men=5 and (b) women=159 and men=10. Five components of physical fitness were self-assessed by Visual Analogue Scales with illustrations and verbal anchors for the extremes: aerobic fitness, muscle strength, endurance, flexibility, and balance. Convergent and divergent validity were evaluated by age-adjusted correlations stratified by sex with performance-based measures of physical fitness. Self-assessed aerobic fitness (r = .36 - .64) (women/men), muscle strength (r = .30 - .51), and flexibility (r = .36 - .31) showed moderate convergent validity. The divergent validity was satisfactory except for flexibility among men. The reliability was moderate to good (ICC = .62 - .80). Self-assessed aerobic fitness, muscle strength, and flexibility showed moderate construct validity and moderate to good reliability using visual analogues.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
Volume104
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)519-33
Number of pages14
ISSN0031-5125
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity and reliability of self-assessed physical fitness using visual analogue scales.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this