Urethral pressure reflectometry, a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the prostatic urethra: Testing in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms

Mikael Aagaard; Niels Klarskov; Jens Sønksen; Per Bagi; Gunnar Lose

doi:10.3109/21681805.2013.831946

Urethral pressure reflectometry, a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the prostatic urethra: Testing in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms

Mikael Aagaard, Niels Klarskov, Jens Sønksen, Per Bagi, Gunnar Lose

Department of Clinical Medicine

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR) was introduced in 2005, for simultaneous measurement of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. It has shown to be more reproducible than conventional pressure measurement. Recently, it has been tested in the anal canal and the prostatic urethra. The primary aim of this study was to describe UPR in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study investigated 18 men, median age 59 (range 50-77) with UPR and pressure-flow analyses (PQ), the International Prostate Symptom Score and the Danish version of Prostate Symptom Score, flow rate, residual urine measurements, transrectal ultrasound, urethral pressure profilometry and visual analogue scale (Discomfort). UPR parameters measured were opening and closing pressure, opening and closing elastance and hysteresis, from the bladder neck to the sphincter region.

RESULTS: All UPR parameters increased significantly from the bladder neck to the sphincter region, except for the opening pressure between the prostate and the sphincter region. Seven men were obstructed according to PQ, but with no significant differences in any other standard urodynamic parameters. The hysteresis in the sphincter region was significantly lower in the obstructed group (p = 0.005). Discomfort was significantly lower with PQ compared to UPR (p = 0.04). Nine men had slight bleeding from the urethra during measurement with UPR.

CONCLUSIONS: The increase in all parameters from the bladder neck to the sphincter region is consistent with previous studies measuring the same parameters. The hysteresis may explain why seven men were obstructed according to PQ.

Original language	English
Journal	Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Volume	48
Issue number	2
Pages (from-to)	195-202
Number of pages	8
ISSN	0036-5599
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2013.831946
Publication status	Published - Apr 2014

Keywords

Aged
Biophysical Processes
Diagnostic Techniques, Urological
Equipment Design
Humans
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Male
Middle Aged
Pressure
Time Factors
Urethra
Urodynamics

Access to Document

10.3109/21681805.2013.831946

Cite this

Aagaard, M., Klarskov, N., Sønksen, J., Bagi, P., & Lose, G. (2014). Urethral pressure reflectometry, a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the prostatic urethra: Testing in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms . Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 48(2), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2013.831946

Urethral pressure reflectometry, a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the prostatic urethra: Testing in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms . / Aagaard, Mikael; Klarskov, Niels ; Sønksen, Jens et al.
In: Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, Vol. 48, No. 2, 04.2014, p. 195-202.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Aagaard, M, Klarskov, N , Sønksen, J, Bagi, P & Lose, G 2014, 'Urethral pressure reflectometry, a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the prostatic urethra: Testing in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms ', Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 195-202. https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2013.831946

@article{8fd65be86b9645c59e8fd9e6a0cfdd47,

title = "Urethral pressure reflectometry, a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the prostatic urethra: Testing in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms ",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR) was introduced in 2005, for simultaneous measurement of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. It has shown to be more reproducible than conventional pressure measurement. Recently, it has been tested in the anal canal and the prostatic urethra. The primary aim of this study was to describe UPR in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study investigated 18 men, median age 59 (range 50-77) with UPR and pressure-flow analyses (PQ), the International Prostate Symptom Score and the Danish version of Prostate Symptom Score, flow rate, residual urine measurements, transrectal ultrasound, urethral pressure profilometry and visual analogue scale (Discomfort). UPR parameters measured were opening and closing pressure, opening and closing elastance and hysteresis, from the bladder neck to the sphincter region.RESULTS: All UPR parameters increased significantly from the bladder neck to the sphincter region, except for the opening pressure between the prostate and the sphincter region. Seven men were obstructed according to PQ, but with no significant differences in any other standard urodynamic parameters. The hysteresis in the sphincter region was significantly lower in the obstructed group (p = 0.005). Discomfort was significantly lower with PQ compared to UPR (p = 0.04). Nine men had slight bleeding from the urethra during measurement with UPR.CONCLUSIONS: The increase in all parameters from the bladder neck to the sphincter region is consistent with previous studies measuring the same parameters. The hysteresis may explain why seven men were obstructed according to PQ.",

keywords = "Aged, Biophysical Processes, Diagnostic Techniques, Urological, Equipment Design, Humans, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Male, Middle Aged, Pressure, Time Factors, Urethra, Urodynamics",

author = "Mikael Aagaard and Niels Klarskov and Jens S{\o}nksen and Per Bagi and Gunnar Lose",

year = "2014",

month = apr,

doi = "10.3109/21681805.2013.831946",

language = "English",

volume = "48",

pages = "195--202",

journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology",

issn = "0036-5599",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urethral pressure reflectometry, a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the prostatic urethra

T2 - Testing in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms

AU - Aagaard, Mikael

AU - Klarskov, Niels

AU - Sønksen, Jens

AU - Bagi, Per

AU - Lose, Gunnar

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR) was introduced in 2005, for simultaneous measurement of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. It has shown to be more reproducible than conventional pressure measurement. Recently, it has been tested in the anal canal and the prostatic urethra. The primary aim of this study was to describe UPR in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study investigated 18 men, median age 59 (range 50-77) with UPR and pressure-flow analyses (PQ), the International Prostate Symptom Score and the Danish version of Prostate Symptom Score, flow rate, residual urine measurements, transrectal ultrasound, urethral pressure profilometry and visual analogue scale (Discomfort). UPR parameters measured were opening and closing pressure, opening and closing elastance and hysteresis, from the bladder neck to the sphincter region.RESULTS: All UPR parameters increased significantly from the bladder neck to the sphincter region, except for the opening pressure between the prostate and the sphincter region. Seven men were obstructed according to PQ, but with no significant differences in any other standard urodynamic parameters. The hysteresis in the sphincter region was significantly lower in the obstructed group (p = 0.005). Discomfort was significantly lower with PQ compared to UPR (p = 0.04). Nine men had slight bleeding from the urethra during measurement with UPR.CONCLUSIONS: The increase in all parameters from the bladder neck to the sphincter region is consistent with previous studies measuring the same parameters. The hysteresis may explain why seven men were obstructed according to PQ.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR) was introduced in 2005, for simultaneous measurement of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. It has shown to be more reproducible than conventional pressure measurement. Recently, it has been tested in the anal canal and the prostatic urethra. The primary aim of this study was to describe UPR in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study investigated 18 men, median age 59 (range 50-77) with UPR and pressure-flow analyses (PQ), the International Prostate Symptom Score and the Danish version of Prostate Symptom Score, flow rate, residual urine measurements, transrectal ultrasound, urethral pressure profilometry and visual analogue scale (Discomfort). UPR parameters measured were opening and closing pressure, opening and closing elastance and hysteresis, from the bladder neck to the sphincter region.RESULTS: All UPR parameters increased significantly from the bladder neck to the sphincter region, except for the opening pressure between the prostate and the sphincter region. Seven men were obstructed according to PQ, but with no significant differences in any other standard urodynamic parameters. The hysteresis in the sphincter region was significantly lower in the obstructed group (p = 0.005). Discomfort was significantly lower with PQ compared to UPR (p = 0.04). Nine men had slight bleeding from the urethra during measurement with UPR.CONCLUSIONS: The increase in all parameters from the bladder neck to the sphincter region is consistent with previous studies measuring the same parameters. The hysteresis may explain why seven men were obstructed according to PQ.

KW - Aged

KW - Biophysical Processes

KW - Diagnostic Techniques, Urological

KW - Equipment Design

KW - Humans

KW - Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Pressure

KW - Time Factors

KW - Urethra

KW - Urodynamics

U2 - 10.3109/21681805.2013.831946

DO - 10.3109/21681805.2013.831946

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23971742

SN - 0036-5599

VL - 48

SP - 195

EP - 202

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology

IS - 2

ER -

Urethral pressure reflectometry, a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area in the prostatic urethra: Testing in men without bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this