Type I Versus Type II Endometrial Cancer: Differential Impact of Comorbidity

Mette Calundann Noer; Sofie Leisby Antonsen; Bent Ottesen; Ib Jarle Christensen; Claus Høgdall

doi:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001184

Type I Versus Type II Endometrial Cancer: Differential Impact of Comorbidity

Mette Calundann Noer, Sofie Leisby Antonsen, Bent Ottesen, Ib Jarle Christensen, Claus Høgdall

Department of Clinical Medicine

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Two distinct types of endometrial carcinoma (EC) with different etiology, tumor characteristics, and prognosis are recognized. We investigated if the prognostic impact of comorbidity varies between these 2 types of EC. Furthermore, we studied if the recently developed ovarian cancer comorbidity index (OCCI) is useful for prediction of survival in EC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide register-based cohort study was based on data from 6487 EC patients diagnosed in Denmark between 2005 and 2015. Patients were assigned a comorbidity index score according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the OCCI. Kaplan-Meier survival statistics and adjusted multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the differential association between comorbidity and overall survival in types I and II EC.

RESULTS: The distribution of comorbidities varied between the 2 EC types. A consistent association between increasing levels of comorbidity and poorer survival was observed for both types. Cox regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between cancer stage and comorbidity indicating that the impact of comorbidity varied with stage. In contrast, the interaction between comorbidity and EC type was not significant. Both the CCI and the OCCI were useful measurements of comorbidity, but the CCI was the strongest predictor in this patient population.

CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity is an important prognostic factor in type I as well as in type II EC although the overall prognosis differs significantly between the 2 types of EC. The prognostic impact of comorbidity varies with stage but not with type of EC.

Original language	English
Journal	International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Volume	28
Issue number	3
Pages (from-to)	586-593
ISSN	1048-891X
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001184
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2018

Keywords

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Cohort Studies
Comorbidity
Endometrial Neoplasms/classification
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Young Adult

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1097/IGC.0000000000001184

Cite this

@article{366c9cf897c94a32a044f6d1ba821339,

title = "Type I Versus Type II Endometrial Cancer: Differential Impact of Comorbidity",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Two distinct types of endometrial carcinoma (EC) with different etiology, tumor characteristics, and prognosis are recognized. We investigated if the prognostic impact of comorbidity varies between these 2 types of EC. Furthermore, we studied if the recently developed ovarian cancer comorbidity index (OCCI) is useful for prediction of survival in EC.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide register-based cohort study was based on data from 6487 EC patients diagnosed in Denmark between 2005 and 2015. Patients were assigned a comorbidity index score according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the OCCI. Kaplan-Meier survival statistics and adjusted multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the differential association between comorbidity and overall survival in types I and II EC.RESULTS: The distribution of comorbidities varied between the 2 EC types. A consistent association between increasing levels of comorbidity and poorer survival was observed for both types. Cox regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between cancer stage and comorbidity indicating that the impact of comorbidity varied with stage. In contrast, the interaction between comorbidity and EC type was not significant. Both the CCI and the OCCI were useful measurements of comorbidity, but the CCI was the strongest predictor in this patient population.CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity is an important prognostic factor in type I as well as in type II EC although the overall prognosis differs significantly between the 2 types of EC. The prognostic impact of comorbidity varies with stage but not with type of EC.",

keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Endometrial Neoplasms/classification, Female, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Young Adult",

author = "Noer, {Mette Calundann} and Antonsen, {Sofie Leisby} and Bent Ottesen and Christensen, {Ib Jarle} and Claus H{\o}gdall",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1097/IGC.0000000000001184",

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "586--593",

journal = "International Journal of Gynecological Cancer",

issn = "1048-891X",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Ltd.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Type I Versus Type II Endometrial Cancer

T2 - Differential Impact of Comorbidity

AU - Noer, Mette Calundann

AU - Antonsen, Sofie Leisby

AU - Ottesen, Bent

AU - Christensen, Ib Jarle

AU - Høgdall, Claus

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Two distinct types of endometrial carcinoma (EC) with different etiology, tumor characteristics, and prognosis are recognized. We investigated if the prognostic impact of comorbidity varies between these 2 types of EC. Furthermore, we studied if the recently developed ovarian cancer comorbidity index (OCCI) is useful for prediction of survival in EC.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide register-based cohort study was based on data from 6487 EC patients diagnosed in Denmark between 2005 and 2015. Patients were assigned a comorbidity index score according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the OCCI. Kaplan-Meier survival statistics and adjusted multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the differential association between comorbidity and overall survival in types I and II EC.RESULTS: The distribution of comorbidities varied between the 2 EC types. A consistent association between increasing levels of comorbidity and poorer survival was observed for both types. Cox regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between cancer stage and comorbidity indicating that the impact of comorbidity varied with stage. In contrast, the interaction between comorbidity and EC type was not significant. Both the CCI and the OCCI were useful measurements of comorbidity, but the CCI was the strongest predictor in this patient population.CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity is an important prognostic factor in type I as well as in type II EC although the overall prognosis differs significantly between the 2 types of EC. The prognostic impact of comorbidity varies with stage but not with type of EC.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Two distinct types of endometrial carcinoma (EC) with different etiology, tumor characteristics, and prognosis are recognized. We investigated if the prognostic impact of comorbidity varies between these 2 types of EC. Furthermore, we studied if the recently developed ovarian cancer comorbidity index (OCCI) is useful for prediction of survival in EC.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide register-based cohort study was based on data from 6487 EC patients diagnosed in Denmark between 2005 and 2015. Patients were assigned a comorbidity index score according to the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the OCCI. Kaplan-Meier survival statistics and adjusted multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the differential association between comorbidity and overall survival in types I and II EC.RESULTS: The distribution of comorbidities varied between the 2 EC types. A consistent association between increasing levels of comorbidity and poorer survival was observed for both types. Cox regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between cancer stage and comorbidity indicating that the impact of comorbidity varied with stage. In contrast, the interaction between comorbidity and EC type was not significant. Both the CCI and the OCCI were useful measurements of comorbidity, but the CCI was the strongest predictor in this patient population.CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity is an important prognostic factor in type I as well as in type II EC although the overall prognosis differs significantly between the 2 types of EC. The prognostic impact of comorbidity varies with stage but not with type of EC.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Endometrial Neoplasms/classification

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoplasm Staging

KW - Prognosis

KW - Proportional Hazards Models

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001184

DO - 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001184

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29303936

SN - 1048-891X

VL - 28

SP - 586

EP - 593

JO - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

JF - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

IS - 3

ER -

Type I Versus Type II Endometrial Cancer: Differential Impact of Comorbidity

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this